334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20443511)
1. Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry.
Bliznakova K; Kolitsi Z; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1893-903. PubMed ID: 20443511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image quality evaluation of breast tomosynthesis with synchrotron radiation.
Malliori A; Bliznakova K; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Rigon L; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5621-34. PubMed ID: 22957628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Goodsitt MM; Hadjiiski LM; Ge J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3781-95. PubMed ID: 17089843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of algorithms for out-of-plane artifacts removal in digital tomosynthesis reconstructions.
Bliznakova K; Bliznakov Z; Buliev I
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Jul; 107(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 22056810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An iterative reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis imaging using real data at three radiation doses.
Polat A; Yildirim I
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 29504549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers.
Van de Sompel D; Brady SM; Boone J
Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 20713313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of time-efficient reconstruction methods in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Svahn TM; Houssami N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):331-6. PubMed ID: 25855075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In-line phase-contrast breast tomosynthesis: a phantom feasibility study at a synchrotron radiation facility.
Bliznakova K; Russo P; Kamarianakis Z; Mettivier G; Requardt H; Bravin A; Buliev I
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 61(16):6243-63. PubMed ID: 27486086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast tomosynthesis using the multiple projection algorithm adapted for stationary detectors.
Malliori A; Bliznakova K; Bliznakov Z; Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Pallikarakis N
J Xray Sci Technol; 2016; 24(1):23-41. PubMed ID: 26890907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of 3DOSEM and MAP algorithms for reconstructing low count SPECT acquisitions.
Grootjans W; Meeuwis AP; Slump CH; de Geus-Oei LF; Gotthardt M; Visser EP
Z Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 26(4):311-322. PubMed ID: 26725165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the spline reconstruction technique for PET.
Kastis GA; Kyriakopoulou D; Gaitanis A; Fernández Y; Hutton BF; Fokas AS
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042501. PubMed ID: 24694154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of a constrained paired-view technique in iterative reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis.
Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101901. PubMed ID: 24089903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oblique reconstructions in tomosynthesis. II. Super-resolution.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111912. PubMed ID: 24320445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital tomosynthesis: technique.
Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):489-97. PubMed ID: 24792651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.
Wu T; Moore RH; Rafferty EA; Kopans DB
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2636-47. PubMed ID: 15487747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach.
Hu YH; Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5242-52. PubMed ID: 19175083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
