335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20443511)
21. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
Sechopoulos I; Ghetti C
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1199-207. PubMed ID: 19472626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Reconstruction Algorithms for Decreasing the Exposure Dose During Digital Tomosynthesis for Arthroplasty: a Phantom Study.
Gomi T; Sakai R; Goto M; Watanabe Y; Takeda T; Umeda T
J Digit Imaging; 2016 Aug; 29(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 26943661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A novel pre-processing technique for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Kim H; Lee T; Hong J; Sabir S; Lee JR; Choi YW; Kim HH; Chae EY; Cho S
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):417-425. PubMed ID: 28032909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. New reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis: better image quality for humans and computers.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Teuwen J; Vreemann S; Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Gubern-Merida A; Sechopoulos I
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 29254355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6003-14. PubMed ID: 21158312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Imaging performance of phase-contrast breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation and a CdTe photon-counting detector.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; Golosio B; Oliva P; Spandre G; Di Lillo F; Fedon C; Longo R; Russo P
Phys Med; 2016 May; 32(5):681-90. PubMed ID: 27160829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A simple, direct method for x-ray scatter estimation and correction in digital radiography and cone-beam CT.
Siewerdsen JH; Daly MJ; Bakhtiar B; Moseley DJ; Richard S; Keller H; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):187-97. PubMed ID: 16485425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system.
Zhou J; Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):1098-109. PubMed ID: 17441255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology.
Price RG; Vance S; Cattaneo R; Schultz L; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst CK
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081907. PubMed ID: 25086538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver.
Baker ME; Dong F; Primak A; Obuchowski NA; Einstein D; Gandhi N; Herts BR; Purysko A; Remer E; Vachhani N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 22733888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. High-attenuation artifact reduction in breast tomosynthesis using a novel reconstruction algorithm.
Dustler M; Wicklein J; Förnvik H; Boita J; Bakic P; Lång K
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():21-26. PubMed ID: 31153567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Low tube voltage intermediate tube current liver MDCT: sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm for detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma.
Yu MH; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Baek JH; Han JK; Choi BI; Flohr TG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jul; 201(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 23789655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ultra-low peak voltage CT colonography: effect of iterative reconstruction algorithms on performance of radiologists who use anthropomorphic colonic phantoms.
Shin CI; Kim SH; Lee ES; Lee DH; Hwang EJ; Chung SY; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):759-71. PubMed ID: 25010640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Image quality comparison between a phase-contrast synchrotron radiation breast CT and a clinical breast CT: a phantom based study.
Brombal L; Arfelli F; Delogu P; Donato S; Mettivier G; Michielsen K; Oliva P; Taibi A; Sechopoulos I; Longo R; Fedon C
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17778. PubMed ID: 31780707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Low-dose 4DCT reconstruction via temporal nonlocal means.
Tian Z; Jia X; Dong B; Lou Y; Jiang SB
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1359-65. PubMed ID: 21520846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of back projection methods for breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction.
Zhou W; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25384538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
