These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20443807)

  • 21. Measurement of cone beam CT coincidence with megavoltage isocentre and image sharpness using the QUASAR Penta-Guide phantom.
    Sykes JR; Lindsay R; Dean CJ; Brettle DS; Magee DR; Thwaites DI
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(19):5275-93. PubMed ID: 18758000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: relationship between cone-beam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography.
    Naitoh M; Hirukawa A; Katsumata A; Ariji E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 19250241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How accurate is CBCT in measuring bone density? A comparative CBCT-CT in vitro study.
    Cassetta M; Stefanelli LV; Pacifici A; Pacifici L; Barbato E
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):471-8. PubMed ID: 23294461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A clinical pilot study of jawbone mineral density measured by the newly developed dual-energy cone-beam computed tomography method compared to calibrated multislice computed tomography.
    Kim HJ; Kim JE; Choo J; Min J; Chang S; Lee SC; Pyun WB; Seo KS; Karm MH; Koo KT; Rhyu IC; Myoung H; Heo MS
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2019 Dec; 49(4):295-299. PubMed ID: 31915615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Metallic materials in the exomass impair cone beam CT voxel values.
    Candemil AP; Salmon B; Freitas DQ; Ambrosano GM; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Jul; 47(6):20180011. PubMed ID: 29582689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The assessment of trabecular bone parameters and cortical bone strength: a comparison of micro-CT and dental cone-beam CT.
    Hsu JT; Wang SP; Huang HL; Chen YJ; Wu J; Tsai MT
    J Biomech; 2013 Oct; 46(15):2611-8. PubMed ID: 24011361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bone quality evaluation: comparison of cone beam computed tomography and subjective surgical assessment.
    Valiyaparambil JV; Yamany I; Ortiz D; Shafer DM; Pendrys D; Freilich M; Mallya SM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1271-7. PubMed ID: 23057044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Evaluating Bone Density and Cortical Bone Thickness at the Implant Site: Micro-Computed Tomography and Histologic Analysis.
    Suttapreyasri S; Suapear P; Leepong N
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 29(8):2026-2031. PubMed ID: 29894463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improved accuracy of cortical bone mineralization measured by polychromatic microcomputed tomography using a novel high mineral density composite calibration phantom.
    Deuerling JM; Rudy DJ; Niebur GL; Roeder RK
    Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):5138-45. PubMed ID: 20964233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating Maxilla Bone Quality Through Clinical Investigation of Voxel Grey Scale Values from Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Dental Use.
    Andruch K; Płachta A
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(6):1071-7. PubMed ID: 26771981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of anatomical location on CT numbers in cone beam computed tomography.
    Oliveira ML; Tosoni GM; Lindsey DH; Mendoza K; Tetradis S; Mallya SM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Apr; 115(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 23522649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Are metal artefact reduction algorithms effective to correct cone beam CT artefacts arising from the exomass?
    Candemil AP; Salmon B; Freitas DQ; Ambrosano GMB; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Mar; 48(3):20180290. PubMed ID: 30540919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of exposure factors on the variability of CBCT voxel values: a phantom study.
    Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ; Ambrosano GM; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20140128. PubMed ID: 24869906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quantification of voxel values in micro computed tomography using multiple porosity hydroxyapatite blocks.
    Naitoh M; Watanabe H; Kuwana R; Hishikawa T; Hayashi H; Miyamae S; Mitani A; Ariji E
    Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn; 2018; 95(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 30101950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of gray values in CBCT and MSCT images for determination of density: influence of variation of FOV size.
    Rodrigues AF; Campos MJ; Chaoubah A; Fraga MR; Farinazzo Vitral RW
    Implant Dent; 2015 Apr; 24(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 25706259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The accuracy of CBCT in measuring jaws bone density.
    Cassetta M; Stefanelli LV; Di Carlo S; Pompa G; Barbato E
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2012 Oct; 16(10):1425-9. PubMed ID: 23104660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Can dental cone beam computed tomography assess bone mineral density?
    Kim DG
    J Bone Metab; 2014 May; 21(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 25006568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of voxel size on cone beam computed tomography artifacts arising from the exomass.
    Candemil AP; Salmon B; Ambrosano GMB; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Oct; 132(4):456-464. PubMed ID: 33422474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Standardized method to quantify the variation in voxel value distribution in patient-simulated CBCT data sets.
    Spin-Neto R; Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(2):20140283. PubMed ID: 25354021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Calibration of cone beam CT using relative attenuation ratio for quantitative assessment of bone density: a small animal study.
    Liu Y; Bäuerle T; Pan L; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Strauss LG; Heiss C; Schnettler R; Semmler W; Cao L
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2013 Sep; 8(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 23225074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.