306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20444125)
1. Effect of letter separation on computerised visual acuity measurements: comparison with the gold standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Brown G; Robson C
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 20444125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.
Laidlaw DA; Tailor V; Shah N; Atamian S; Harcourt C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 17993577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of a computerised visual acuity measurement device in subjects with age-related macular degeneration: comparison with gold standard ETDRS chart measurements.
Bokinni Y; Shah N; Maguire O; Laidlaw DA
Eye (Lond); 2015 Aug; 29(8):1085-91. PubMed ID: 26043703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device.
Rosser DA; Murdoch IE; Fitzke FW; Laidlaw DA
Eye (Lond); 2003 Aug; 17(6):701-6. PubMed ID: 12928680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of printed and computerised crowded Kay picture logMAR tests against gold standard ETDRS acuity test chart measurements in adult and amblyopic paediatric subjects.
Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Rashid S; Hysi P
Eye (Lond); 2012 Apr; 26(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 22193878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual acuity scored by the letter-by-letter or probit methods has lower retest variability than the line assignment method.
Vanden Bosch ME; Wall M
Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 3)():411-7. PubMed ID: 9373488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Thai logarithmic visual acuity chart.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85(6):673-81. PubMed ID: 12322840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating a new logMAR chart designed to improve visual acuity assessment in population-based surveys.
Bourne RR; Rosser DA; Sukudom P; Dineen B; Laidlaw DA; Johnson GJ; Murdoch IE
Eye (Lond); 2003 Aug; 17(6):754-8. PubMed ID: 12928690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Construction and validation of a Tamil logMAR chart.
Varadharajan S; Srinivasan K; Kumaresan B
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Sep; 29(5):526-534. PubMed ID: 19689549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Novel method for analyzing snellen visual acuity measurements.
Gregori NZ; Feuer W; Rosenfeld PJ
Retina; 2010; 30(7):1046-50. PubMed ID: 20559157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A modified ETDRS visual acuity chart for European-wide use.
Plainis S; Tzatzala P; Orphanos Y; Tsilimbaris MK
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):647-53. PubMed ID: 17632314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Repeatability and reliability of the visual acuity examination on logMAR ETDRS and Snellen chart].
Veselý P; Synek S
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 May; 68(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 22913870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-based measurement of letter and word acuity.
Whatham AR; Mermoud C; Déruaz A; Goldschmidt M; Zesiger P; Safran AB
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Mar; 26(2):156-68. PubMed ID: 16460316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computerized repeating and averaging improve the test-retest variability of ETDRS visual acuity measurements: implications for sensitivity and specificity.
Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Shah SP; Sivasubramaniam S; Bunce C; Cousens S
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Dec; 52(13):9397-402. PubMed ID: 22003109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ETDRS-fast: implementing psychophysical adaptive methods to standardized visual acuity measurement with ETDRS charts.
Camparini M; Cassinari P; Ferrigno L; Macaluso C
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 May; 42(6):1226-31. PubMed ID: 11328731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol.
Beck RW; Moke PS; Turpin AH; Ferris FL; SanGiovanni JP; Johnson CA; Birch EE; Chandler DL; Cox TA; Blair RC; Kraker RT
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 12566024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Design of an Arabic near visual acuity chart.
Oduntan AO; al-Abdulmunem MA
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Mar; 17(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 9196680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New visual acuity chart: modification for clinical practice and research.
Pisarnkorskul P; Singhkuna L
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Mar; 86(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 12757065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the reliability of visual acuity measures in young children.
McGraw PV; Winn B; Gray LS; Elliott DB
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 May; 20(3):173-84. PubMed ID: 10897339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
