BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20444128)

  • 1. A comparison of standardised patients, record abstraction and clinical vignettes for the purpose of measuring clinical practice.
    Shah R; Edgar DF; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 May; 30(3):209-24. PubMed ID: 20444128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How well does record abstraction quantify the content of optometric eye examinations in the UK?
    Shah R; Edgar DF; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jul; 29(4):383-96. PubMed ID: 19523086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The content of optometric eye examinations for a presbyopic patient presenting with symptoms of flashing lights.
    Shah R; Edgar DF; Harle DE; Weddell L; Austen DP; Burghardt D; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Mar; 29(2):105-26. PubMed ID: 19236581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The content of optometric eye examinations for a young myope with headaches.
    Shah R; Edgar DF; Rabbetts R; Blakeney SL; Charlesworth P; Harle DE; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):404-21. PubMed ID: 18761478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality.
    Peabody JW; Luck J; Glassman P; Dresselhaus TR; Lee M
    JAMA; 2000 Apr; 283(13):1715-22. PubMed ID: 10755498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fielding incognito standardised patients as 'known' patients in a controlled trial in general practice.
    Maiburg BH; Rethans JJ; van Erk IM; Mathus-Vliegen LM; van Ree JW
    Med Educ; 2004 Dec; 38(12):1229-35. PubMed ID: 15566533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinicolegal aspects of practice guidelines for pediatric eye and vision examination.
    Hatch SW
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Aug; 66(8):501-9. PubMed ID: 7494086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standardized patient methodology to assess refractive error reproducibility.
    Shah R; Edgar DF; Rabbetts R; Harle DE; Evans BJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 May; 86(5):517-28. PubMed ID: 19319010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does optometrists' self-reported practice in glaucoma detection predict actual practice as determined by standardised patients?
    Theodossiades J; Myint J; Murdoch IE; Edgar DF; Lawrenson JG
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 May; 32(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 22329780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination.
    Srinivasan M; Hauer KE; Der-Martirosian C; Wilkes M; Gesundheit N
    Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 17727526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of standardised patients in optometry training.
    Shah R; Ctori I; Edgar DF; Parker P
    Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Nov; 104(8):848-853. PubMed ID: 33725470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of patient management skills and clinical skills of practising doctors using computer-based case simulations and standardised patients.
    Hawkins R; MacKrell Gaglione M; LaDuca T; Leung C; Sample L; Gliva-McConvey G; Liston W; De Champlain A; Ciccone A
    Med Educ; 2004 Sep; 38(9):958-68. PubMed ID: 15327677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design and use of vignettes to investigate referral decision-making by optometrists.
    Parkins DJ; Shah B; Benwell MJ; Evans BJW; Edgar DF
    J Optom; 2021; 14(4):346-354. PubMed ID: 33967018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glaucoma detection: the content of optometric eye examinations for a presbyopic patient of African racial descent.
    Shah R; Edgar DF; Spry PG; Harper RA; Kotecha A; Rughani S; Evans BJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Apr; 93(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 19060011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optometrists' clinical reasoning made explicit: a qualitative study.
    Faucher C; Tardif J; Chamberland M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1774-84. PubMed ID: 23160443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of continuous quality improvement on compliance with clinical practice guidelines in an optometric clinic: a retrospective review.
    Hilber DJ; Whitwell KJ; Krumholz DM; Pace CA
    Optometry; 2000 Feb; 71(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 10970252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study.
    Peabody JW; Luck J; Glassman P; Jain S; Hansen J; Spell M; Lee M
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 Nov; 141(10):771-80. PubMed ID: 15545677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Criterion validity of responses to patient vignettes: an analysis based on management of female urinary incontinence.
    Sandvik H
    Fam Med; 1995 Jun; 27(6):388-92. PubMed ID: 7665027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Workforce projections for optometry.
    White AJ; Doksum T; White C
    Optometry; 2000 May; 71(5):284-300. PubMed ID: 10998943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal clinical management of eye problems: the role of optometrists in managed care plans.
    Soroka M; Krumholz DM; Krasner M; Portello J
    Optometry; 2000 Dec; 71(12):781-90. PubMed ID: 11145303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.