These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20444135)

  • 1. Adaptive gait changes in long-term wearers of contact lens monovision correction.
    Chapman GJ; Vale A; Buckley J; Scally AJ; Elliott DB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 May; 30(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 20444135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gait alterations negotiating a raised surface induced by monocular blur.
    Vale A; Buckley JG; Elliott DB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(12):1128-34. PubMed ID: 19050467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of monocular refractive blur on gait parameters when negotiating a raised surface.
    Vale A; Scally A; Buckley JG; Elliott DB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Mar; 28(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 18339044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes to control of adaptive gait in individuals with long-standing reduced stereoacuity.
    Buckley JG; Panesar GK; MacLellan MJ; Pacey IE; Barrett BT
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 May; 51(5):2487-95. PubMed ID: 20335609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multifocal spectacles increase variability in toe clearance and risk of tripping in the elderly.
    Johnson L; Buckley JG; Scally AJ; Elliott DB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 48(4):1466-71. PubMed ID: 17389472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual comparison of an artificial pupil contact lens to monovision.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):E1022-9. PubMed ID: 22729169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses.
    Kirschen DG; Hung CC; Nakano TR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 76(12):832-7. PubMed ID: 10612404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive gait changes due to spectacle magnification and dioptric blur in older people.
    Elliott DB; Chapman GJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Feb; 51(2):718-22. PubMed ID: 19797224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monovision: a review.
    Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Sep; 27(5):417-39. PubMed ID: 17718882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual comparison of multifocal contact lens to monovision.
    Gupta N; Naroo SA; Wolffsohn JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 86(2):E98-105. PubMed ID: 19156009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptation to multifocal and monovision contact lens correction.
    Fernandes PR; Neves HI; Lopes-Ferreira DP; Jorge JM; González-Meijome JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 90(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 23376896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An exploration of modified monovision with diffractive bifocal contact lenses.
    Freeman MH; Charman WN
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Jul; 30(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 17289423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.
    Situ P; Du Toit R; Fonn D; Simpson T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12861114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peripheral visual acuity with monovision and other contact lens corrections for presbyopia.
    Collins MJ; Brown B; Verney SJ; Makras M; Bowman KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Jun; 66(6):370-4. PubMed ID: 2771322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of visual acuity, stereoacuity, and ocular dominance in monovision patient success.
    Erickson P; McGill EC
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Oct; 69(10):761-4. PubMed ID: 1436996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monovision.
    Josephson JE; Erickson P; Back A; Holden BA; Harris M; Tomlinson A; Caffrey BE; Finnemore V; Silbert J
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1990 Nov; 61(11):820-6. PubMed ID: 2081823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of single-vision distance spectacles improves landing control during step descent in well-adapted multifocal lens-wearers.
    Timmis MA; Johnson L; Elliott DB; Buckley JG
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Aug; 51(8):3903-8. PubMed ID: 20207976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Change in refractive anisometropia in presbyopic adults wearing monovision contact lens correction.
    Wick B; Westin E
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Jan; 76(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 10030613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.