167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20444138)
1. Comparison of alternate cover test reliability at near in non-strabismus between experienced and novice examiners.
Hrynchak PK; Herriot C; Irving EL
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 May; 30(3):304-9. PubMed ID: 20444138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The intraexaminer and interexaminer repeatability of the alternate cover test using different prism neutralization endpoints.
Johns HA; Manny RE; Fern K; Hu YS
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 81(12):939-46. PubMed ID: 15592119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of and comparisons among three variations of the alternating cover test.
Rainey BB; Schroeder TL; Goss DA; Grosvenor TP
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 Sep; 18(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 10023476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter-examiner variability and agreement of the alternate prism cover test (APCT) measurements of strabismus performed by 4 examiners.
de Jongh E; Leach C; Tjon-Fo-Sang MJ; Bjerre A
Strabismus; 2014 Dec; 22(4):158-66. PubMed ID: 25360761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of examiner experience and technique on the alternate cover test.
Anderson HA; Manny RE; Cotter SA; Mitchell GL; Irani JA
Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Mar; 87(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 20125058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of heterophoria and phoria adaptation using an automated objective system compared to clinical methods.
Han SJ; Guo Y; Granger-Donetti B; Vicci VR; Alvarez TL
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Jan; 30(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 19682268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reliability of a video-enhanced Hirschberg test under clinical conditions.
Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H; Tadokoro Y; Okano M; Furuse T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Dec; 36(13):2678-85. PubMed ID: 7499090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter-examiner repeatability of heterophoria tests.
Rainey BB; Schroeder TL; Goss DA; Grosvenor TP
Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Oct; 75(10):719-26. PubMed ID: 9798211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intertester reliability and diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test.
Hall TM; Robinson KW; Fujinawa O; Akasaka K; Pyne EA
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 May; 31(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 18486750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interexaminer reliability of a leg length analysis procedure among novice and experienced practitioners.
Holt KR; Russell DG; Hoffmann NJ; Bruce BI; Bushell PM; Taylor HH
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009; 32(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 19362232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A quantitative analysis of eye movements during the cover test--a preliminary report.
Barnard NA; Thomson WD
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Sep; 15(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 8524567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How good is the estimated cover test at predicting the von Graefe phoria measurement?
Calvin H; Rupnow P; Grosvenor T
Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Nov; 73(11):701-6. PubMed ID: 8950752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Estimating squint angle according to the degree of refixation saccades. Model trial fixation saccades].
Barry JC
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Aug; 215(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 10483561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of varying examiner position on alternating cover test results.
Clark TE; Reynolds W; Coffey B
Optometry; 2003 Apr; 74(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 12703688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of rotary prism fusional vergence ranges.
Penisten DK; Hofstetter HW; Goss DA
Optometry; 2001 Feb; 72(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 11243428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interexaminer differences in the traction test of the superior oblique tendon.
Sato M; Amano E; Okamoto Y; Ota Y; Hirai T
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2005; 49(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 15944826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phoria variation secondary to cover test technique at near.
Sparks BI
Optometry; 2002 Jan; 73(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 12363239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A quantitative analysis method for comitant exotropia using video-oculography with alternate cover.
Park N; Park B; Oh M; Moon S; Kim M
BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):80. PubMed ID: 29566654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An enhancement to the Maddox Wing test for the reliable measurement of horizontal heterophoria.
Pointer JS
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):446-51. PubMed ID: 16101952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of near heterophoria tests under varying conditions on an adult sample.
Lam AK; Lam A; Charm J; Wong KM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Mar; 25(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 15713208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
