These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20444138)

  • 21. Is there a difference in the reliable measurement of temporomandibular disorder signs between experienced and inexperienced examiners?
    Leher A; Graf K; PhoDuc JM; Rammelsberg P
    J Orofac Pain; 2005; 19(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 15779540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. PulStar differential compliance spinal instrument: a randomized interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability study.
    Leach RA; Parker PL; Veal PS
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Oct; 26(8):493-501. PubMed ID: 14569215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Repeatability and agreement in the measurement of horizontal fusional vergences.
    Antona B; Barrio A; Barra F; Gonzalez E; Sanchez I
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 18761485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Defining real change in prism-cover test measurements.
    Holmes JM; Leske DA; Hohberger GG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):381-5. PubMed ID: 18045567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do dissociated or associated phoria predict the comfortable prism?
    Otto JM; Kromeier M; Bach M; Kommerell G
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 May; 246(5):631-9. PubMed ID: 18379816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study.
    Schmidt P; Maguire M; Dobson V; Quinn G; Ciner E; Cyert L; Kulp MT; Moore B; Orel-Bixler D; Redford M; Ying GS;
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Apr; 111(4):637-50. PubMed ID: 15051194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms.
    Karania R; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):507-22. PubMed ID: 16918777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intra-observer and inter-observer variation of Hertel exophthalmometry.
    Lam AK; Lam CF; Leung WK; Hung PK
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jul; 29(4):472-6. PubMed ID: 19523092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The symptomatic patient with normal phorias at distance and near: what tests detect a binocular vision problem?
    Gall R; Wick B
    Optometry; 2003 May; 74(5):309-22. PubMed ID: 12795318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interexaminer repeatability of a new, modified prentice card compared with established phoria tests.
    Wong EP; Fricke TR; Dinardo C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 79(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 12086303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Examiner differences in the assessment of different malocclusions.
    Gesch D; Schröder W; Kocher T; Kirbschus A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Nov; 67(6):404-13. PubMed ID: 17124559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of binocular alignment using the three-dimensional Strabismus Photo Analyzer.
    Yang HK; Han SB; Hwang JM; Kim YJ; Jeong CB; Kim KG
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jan; 96(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 21984778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Practical approach to diagnosis of strabismus.
    Thomas R; Braganza A; George T
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 1996 Jun; 44(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 8916600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measurement of strabismic angle using the distance Krimsky test.
    Joo KS; Koo H; Moon NJ
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):276-81. PubMed ID: 23908574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Proportional (fractional) displacement of the Hirschberg corneal light reflection (test): a new easily memorized aid for strabometry; photogrammetric standardization (calibration).
    Mims JL; Wood RC
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2002; 17(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 12171591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. BVAT distance vs. near stereopsis screening of strabismus, strabismic amblyopia and refractive amblyopia; a prospective study of 68 patients.
    Rutstein RP; Corliss DA
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2000; 15(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 10960226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of examiner differences on KIG-classification when assessing malocclusions.
    Gesch D; Kirbschus A; Schröder W; Bernhardt O; Proff P; Bayerlein T; Gedrange T; Kocher T
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Mar; 67(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 16570130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Do prism corrections according to H.-J. Haase affect ocular prevalence?].
    Schroth V; Jaschinski W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Jan; 224(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 17260317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Repeatability of Associated Phoria Tests.
    Alhassan M; Hovis JK; Chou RB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Aug; 92(8):900-7. PubMed ID: 26099058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Binocular status of dyslexics--are there differences to a healthy comparison group?].
    Riebeling P; Brunner E; Grossjohann R; Clemens S
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Oct; 226(10):794-800. PubMed ID: 19830634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.