BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

514 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20444666)

  • 1. Accuracy of low-dose prospectively gated axial coronary CT angiography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable heart rate.
    Carrascosa P; Capuñay C; Deviggiano A; Goldsmit A; Tajer C; Bettinotti M; Carrascosa J; Ivanc TB; Fallahi A; García MJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2010; 4(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 20444666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography.
    Achenbach S; Goroll T; Seltmann M; Pflederer T; Anders K; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Uder M; Lell M; Marwan M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Apr; 4(4):328-37. PubMed ID: 21492807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial.
    Budoff MJ; Dowe D; Jollis JG; Gitter M; Sutherland J; Halamert E; Scherer M; Bellinger R; Martin A; Benton R; Delago A; Min JK
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 52(21):1724-32. PubMed ID: 19007693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective and retrospective ECG-gating for CT coronary angiography perform similarly accurate at low heart rates.
    Stolzmann P; Goetti R; Baumueller S; Plass A; Falk V; Scheffel H; Feuchtner G; Marincek B; Alkadhi H; Leschka S
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jul; 79(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 20079993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source coronary angiography in the evaluation of coronary artery stenoses.
    Koplay M; Erdogan H; Avci A; Sivri M; Demir K; Guler I; Demir LS; Paksoy Y
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2016 Apr; 97(4):461-9. PubMed ID: 26612669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-dose dual-source CT angiography with iterative reconstruction for coronary artery stent evaluation.
    Eisentopf J; Achenbach S; Ulzheimer S; Layritz C; Wuest W; May M; Lell M; Ropers D; Klinghammer L; Daniel WG; Pflederer T
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Apr; 6(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 23498678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively ECG-triggered axial scanning for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, multivendor, randomized PROTECTION-III study.
    Hausleiter J; Meyer TS; Martuscelli E; Spagnolo P; Yamamoto H; Carrascosa P; Anger T; Lehmkuhl L; Alkadhi H; Martinoff S; Hadamitzky M; Hein F; Bischoff B; Kuse M; Schömig A; Achenbach S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 May; 5(5):484-93. PubMed ID: 22595156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row computed tomography as compared with invasive coronary angiography in unselected, consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Pelliccia F; Pasceri V; Evangelista A; Pergolini A; Barillà F; Viceconte N; Tanzilli G; Schiariti M; Greco C; Gaudio C
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 29(2):443-52. PubMed ID: 22806317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-source versus 64-section CT coronary angiography at lower heart rates: comparison of accuracy and radiation dose.
    Baumüller S; Leschka S; Desbiolles L; Stolzmann P; Scheffel H; Seifert B; Marincek B; Alkadhi H
    Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 19587311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography for evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency: comparison of image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy.
    Lee JH; Chun EJ; Choi SI; Vembar M; Lim C; Park KH; Choi DJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Jun; 27(5):657-67. PubMed ID: 21678128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of calcifications on diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering.
    Stolzmann P; Scheffel H; Leschka S; Plass A; Baumüller S; Marincek B; Alkadhi H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Dec; 191(6):1684-9. PubMed ID: 19020236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode.
    Alkadhi H; Stolzmann P; Desbiolles L; Baumueller S; Goetti R; Plass A; Scheffel H; Feuchtner G; Falk V; Marincek B; Leschka S
    Heart; 2010 Jun; 96(12):933-8. PubMed ID: 20538669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic accuracy of sub-mSv prospective ECG-triggering cardiac CT in young infant with complex congenital heart disease.
    Gao W; Zhong YM; Sun AM; Wang Q; Ouyang RZ; Hu LW; Qiu HS; Wang SY; Li JY
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 32(6):991-8. PubMed ID: 26897005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usefulness of dual-source computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary arteries in heart transplant recipients.
    Kępka C; Sobieszczańsk-Małek M; Pręgowski J; Kruk M; Bekta P; Opolski M; Komuda K; Zieliński T; Witkowski A; Demkow M
    Kardiol Pol; 2012; 70(11):1111-9. PubMed ID: 23180518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low-dose coronary computed tomography angiography using prospective ECG-triggering compared to invasive coronary angiography.
    Hong YJ; Kim SJ; Lee SM; Min PK; Yoon YW; Lee BK; Kim TH
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Mar; 27(3):425-31. PubMed ID: 20680462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive value of zero calcium score and low-end percentiles for the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis in stable patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Vogler N; Meyer M; Fink C; Schoepf UJ; Schönberg SO; Henzler T
    Rofo; 2013 Aug; 185(8):726-32. PubMed ID: 23900940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose.
    Hirai N; Horiguchi J; Fujioka C; Kiguchi M; Yamamoto H; Matsuura N; Kitagawa T; Teragawa H; Kohno N; Ito K
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):424-30. PubMed ID: 18574140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of SSF on Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Within 1 Heart Beat in Patients With High Heart Rate Using a 256-Row Detector Computed Tomography.
    Liang J; Wang H; Xu L; Dong L; Fan Z; Wang R; Sun Z
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 28708724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Step-and-shoot prospectively ECG-gated vs. retrospectively ECG-gated with tube current modulation coronary CT angiography using 128-slice MDCT patients with chest pain: diagnostic performance and radiation dose.
    Kim JS; Choo KS; Jeong DW; Chun KJ; Park YH; Song SG; Park JH; Kim JH; Kim J; Han D; Lim SJ
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Oct; 52(8):860-5. PubMed ID: 21873509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis.
    de Graaf FR; Schuijf JD; van Velzen JE; Boogers MJ; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Reiber JH; Sieders A; Spanó F; Jukema JW; Schalij MJ; van der Wall EE; Bax JJ
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):331-40. PubMed ID: 20404736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.