These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20444666)

  • 1. Accuracy of low-dose prospectively gated axial coronary CT angiography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable heart rate.
    Carrascosa P; Capuñay C; Deviggiano A; Goldsmit A; Tajer C; Bettinotti M; Carrascosa J; Ivanc TB; Fallahi A; García MJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2010; 4(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 20444666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography.
    Achenbach S; Goroll T; Seltmann M; Pflederer T; Anders K; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Uder M; Lell M; Marwan M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Apr; 4(4):328-37. PubMed ID: 21492807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial.
    Budoff MJ; Dowe D; Jollis JG; Gitter M; Sutherland J; Halamert E; Scherer M; Bellinger R; Martin A; Benton R; Delago A; Min JK
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 52(21):1724-32. PubMed ID: 19007693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective and retrospective ECG-gating for CT coronary angiography perform similarly accurate at low heart rates.
    Stolzmann P; Goetti R; Baumueller S; Plass A; Falk V; Scheffel H; Feuchtner G; Marincek B; Alkadhi H; Leschka S
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jul; 79(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 20079993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source coronary angiography in the evaluation of coronary artery stenoses.
    Koplay M; Erdogan H; Avci A; Sivri M; Demir K; Guler I; Demir LS; Paksoy Y
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2016 Apr; 97(4):461-9. PubMed ID: 26612669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-dose dual-source CT angiography with iterative reconstruction for coronary artery stent evaluation.
    Eisentopf J; Achenbach S; Ulzheimer S; Layritz C; Wuest W; May M; Lell M; Ropers D; Klinghammer L; Daniel WG; Pflederer T
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Apr; 6(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 23498678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively ECG-triggered axial scanning for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, multivendor, randomized PROTECTION-III study.
    Hausleiter J; Meyer TS; Martuscelli E; Spagnolo P; Yamamoto H; Carrascosa P; Anger T; Lehmkuhl L; Alkadhi H; Martinoff S; Hadamitzky M; Hein F; Bischoff B; Kuse M; Schömig A; Achenbach S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 May; 5(5):484-93. PubMed ID: 22595156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row computed tomography as compared with invasive coronary angiography in unselected, consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Pelliccia F; Pasceri V; Evangelista A; Pergolini A; Barillà F; Viceconte N; Tanzilli G; Schiariti M; Greco C; Gaudio C
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 29(2):443-52. PubMed ID: 22806317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-source versus 64-section CT coronary angiography at lower heart rates: comparison of accuracy and radiation dose.
    Baumüller S; Leschka S; Desbiolles L; Stolzmann P; Scheffel H; Seifert B; Marincek B; Alkadhi H
    Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 19587311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography for evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency: comparison of image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy.
    Lee JH; Chun EJ; Choi SI; Vembar M; Lim C; Park KH; Choi DJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Jun; 27(5):657-67. PubMed ID: 21678128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of calcifications on diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering.
    Stolzmann P; Scheffel H; Leschka S; Plass A; Baumüller S; Marincek B; Alkadhi H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Dec; 191(6):1684-9. PubMed ID: 19020236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode.
    Alkadhi H; Stolzmann P; Desbiolles L; Baumueller S; Goetti R; Plass A; Scheffel H; Feuchtner G; Falk V; Marincek B; Leschka S
    Heart; 2010 Jun; 96(12):933-8. PubMed ID: 20538669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic accuracy of sub-mSv prospective ECG-triggering cardiac CT in young infant with complex congenital heart disease.
    Gao W; Zhong YM; Sun AM; Wang Q; Ouyang RZ; Hu LW; Qiu HS; Wang SY; Li JY
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 32(6):991-8. PubMed ID: 26897005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usefulness of dual-source computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary arteries in heart transplant recipients.
    Kępka C; Sobieszczańsk-Małek M; Pręgowski J; Kruk M; Bekta P; Opolski M; Komuda K; Zieliński T; Witkowski A; Demkow M
    Kardiol Pol; 2012; 70(11):1111-9. PubMed ID: 23180518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low-dose coronary computed tomography angiography using prospective ECG-triggering compared to invasive coronary angiography.
    Hong YJ; Kim SJ; Lee SM; Min PK; Yoon YW; Lee BK; Kim TH
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Mar; 27(3):425-31. PubMed ID: 20680462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive value of zero calcium score and low-end percentiles for the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis in stable patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Vogler N; Meyer M; Fink C; Schoepf UJ; Schönberg SO; Henzler T
    Rofo; 2013 Aug; 185(8):726-32. PubMed ID: 23900940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose.
    Hirai N; Horiguchi J; Fujioka C; Kiguchi M; Yamamoto H; Matsuura N; Kitagawa T; Teragawa H; Kohno N; Ito K
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):424-30. PubMed ID: 18574140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of SSF on Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Within 1 Heart Beat in Patients With High Heart Rate Using a 256-Row Detector Computed Tomography.
    Liang J; Wang H; Xu L; Dong L; Fan Z; Wang R; Sun Z
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 28708724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Step-and-shoot prospectively ECG-gated vs. retrospectively ECG-gated with tube current modulation coronary CT angiography using 128-slice MDCT patients with chest pain: diagnostic performance and radiation dose.
    Kim JS; Choo KS; Jeong DW; Chun KJ; Park YH; Song SG; Park JH; Kim JH; Kim J; Han D; Lim SJ
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Oct; 52(8):860-5. PubMed ID: 21873509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis.
    de Graaf FR; Schuijf JD; van Velzen JE; Boogers MJ; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Reiber JH; Sieders A; Spanó F; Jukema JW; Schalij MJ; van der Wall EE; Bax JJ
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):331-40. PubMed ID: 20404736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.