BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20445437)

  • 1. Abandon propaganda! Embrace scholarship!
    Dougherty MC
    Nurs Res; 2010; 59(3):157. PubMed ID: 20445437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rigour and respect: aspects for consideration when undertaking and publishing research.
    Marchant S
    Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):264-7. PubMed ID: 20466468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scientific letters.
    Henly SJ
    Nurs Res; 2008; 57(5):301. PubMed ID: 18794713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Focus on peer review.
    Dougherty MC
    Nurs Res; 2010; 59(6):371. PubMed ID: 21048481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Publishing in English-language journals.
    Davis AJ; Tschudin V
    Nurs Ethics; 2007 May; 14(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 17459824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hitting the bull's eye rather than shooting yourself between the eyes.
    Froman RD
    Res Nurs Health; 2008 Oct; 31(5):399-401. PubMed ID: 18613067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consider the source.
    Mason DJ
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Publishing and getting published.
    Gardner G
    Collegian; 2003 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 15534956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stewards of the discipline: The role of referees and peer review.
    Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):169-70. PubMed ID: 20637926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review and the nursing literature.
    Dougherty MC
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
    Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
    Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
    Clarke SP
    Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thoughts on the end of the article: the implications for nursing practice.
    Becker PT
    Res Nurs Health; 2009 Jun; 32(3):241-2. PubMed ID: 19280621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EIC editorial-27:4.
    Chapple C
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(4):263. PubMed ID: 18404620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Someone asked for a "how-to" write editorial.
    Marrelli TM
    Home Healthc Nurse; 2010 Mar; 28(3):133-4. PubMed ID: 20308806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In praise of peer reviewers and the peer review process.
    Peternelj-Taylor C
    J Forensic Nurs; 2010; 6(4):159-61. PubMed ID: 21114756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are we there yet? When is a literature review complete?
    Shultz SM; Dell EY; Bodan CL
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Sep; 109(9):78-9. PubMed ID: 19704244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Western Journal of Nursing Research welcomes stellar review articles.
    Conn VS
    West J Nurs Res; 2009 Feb; 31(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 19150971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SQUIRE Guidelines for reporting improvement studies in healthcare: implications for nursing publications.
    Oermann MH
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2009; 24(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19287244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Format, style, and precision.
    Froman RD
    Res Nurs Health; 2011 Feb; 34(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 21243654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.