These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

38 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20445437)

  • 21. Bibliographic citation management software as a tool for building knowledge.
    Steele SE
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(5):463-6. PubMed ID: 18794696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Guidance on conducting a literature search and reviewing mixed literature.
    Price B
    Nurs Stand; 2009 Feb 18-24; 23(24):43-9; quiz 50, 52. PubMed ID: 19275020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reporting P values.
    Savik K
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2006; 33(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 16717513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Learning disabilities is bigger than a cursory review.
    Caan W; Toocaram J
    Br J Nurs; 2008 Jan 24-Feb 13; 17(2):78-9. PubMed ID: 18414277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Manuscript reviewing: too long a concealed form of scholarship?
    Emden C
    Nurs Inq; 1996 Dec; 3(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 9117767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Requesting access for research purposes: issues and guidelines.
    Woods L; Roberts P
    Nurse Res; 2003; 10(3):38-47. PubMed ID: 12739417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development.
    Grant JS; Davis LL
    Res Nurs Health; 1997 Jun; 20(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 9179180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [A practical guide to perform a good peer review].
    Rosenberg J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2014 Jan; 176(4A):V07130432. PubMed ID: 25347247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The science of reviewing research.
    Oxman AD; Guyatt GH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Dec; 703():125-33; discussion 133-4. PubMed ID: 8192290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Overcome the fragmentation in online propaganda literature: the role of cultural and cognitive sociology.
    Nerino V
    Front Sociol; 2023; 8():1170447. PubMed ID: 37497101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Abandon propaganda! Embrace scholarship!
    Dougherty MC
    Nurs Res; 2010; 59(3):157. PubMed ID: 20445437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
    Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Simplifying the process of research review for the novice researcher.
    Callihan D
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 18199936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ethics in neonatal pain research.
    Axelin A; Salanterä S
    Nurs Ethics; 2008 Jul; 15(4):492-9. PubMed ID: 18515438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Writing to get published.
    Wink DM
    Nephrol Nurs J; 2002 Oct; 29(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 12434452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conceptual debates and empirical evidence about the peer review process for scholarly journals.
    Thomas SP
    J Prof Nurs; 2011; 27(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 21596357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]     [New Search]
    of 2.