BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20445488)

  • 1. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil maintenance immunosuppression: outcomes analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database.
    Irish W; Arcona S; Gifford RJ; Baillie GM; Cooper M
    Transplantation; 2010 Jul; 90(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20445488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium: a large, single-center comparison of dose adjustments and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.
    Sollinger HW; Sundberg AK; Leverson G; Voss BJ; Pirsch JD
    Transplantation; 2010 Feb; 89(4):446-51. PubMed ID: 20177347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium: safe conversion from mycophenolate mofetil in maintenance renal transplant recipients.
    Budde K; Glander P; Diekmann F; Dragun D; Waiser J; Fritsche L; Neumayer HH
    Transplant Proc; 2004 Mar; 36(2 Suppl):524S-527S. PubMed ID: 15041401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing outcomes associated with dose manipulations of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients.
    Cooper M; Deering KL; Slakey DP; Harshaw Q; Arcona S; McCann EL; Rasetto FA; Florman SS
    Transplantation; 2009 Aug; 88(4):514-20. PubMed ID: 19696634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in primary renal transplant recipients given tacrolimus and daclizumab/thymoglobulin: one year follow-up.
    Ciancio G; Burke GW; Gaynor JJ; Roth D; Sageshima J; Kupin W; Tueros L; Hanson L; Rosen A; Ruiz P; Miller J
    Transplantation; 2008 Jul; 86(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 18622280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term dosing patterns of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil with tacrolimus after renal transplantation.
    Langone A; Shihab F; Pankewycz O; Doria C; Wiland A; McCague K; Chan L
    Clin Transplant; 2014 Sep; 28(9):961-7. PubMed ID: 24893821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium: therapeutic equivalence to mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients.
    Sollinger H
    Transplant Proc; 2004 Mar; 36(2 Suppl):517S-520S. PubMed ID: 15041399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Superior efficacy of enteric-coated mycophenolate vs mycophenolate mofetil in de novo transplant recipients: pooled analysis.
    Salvadori M; Bertoni E; Budde K; Holzer H; Civati G; Lien B; Arns W
    Transplant Proc; 2010 May; 42(4):1325-8. PubMed ID: 20534293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term administration of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in kidney transplant patients.
    Salvadori M;
    Transplant Proc; 2005 Mar; 37(2):909-11. PubMed ID: 15848572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy and safety of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in renal transplant patients with diabetes mellitus: post hoc analyses from three clinical trials.
    Pietruck F; Budde K; Salvadori M; Sollinger H; Bourbigot B; Gentil MA; Oppenheimer F
    Clin Transplant; 2007; 21(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 17302600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium given in combination with tacrolimus has a lower incidence of serious infections in Asian renal-transplant recipients compared with mycophenolate mofetil.
    Feng JJ; Zhang LW; Zhao P; Bow LM; Tian J
    Int J Clin Pract Suppl; 2015 May; (183):1-7. PubMed ID: 26176848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of dose reductions on efficacy outcome in heart transplant patients receiving enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil at 12 months post-transplantation.
    Segovia J; Gerosa G; Almenar L; Livi U; Viganò M; Arizón JM; Yonan N; Di Salvo TG; Renlund DG; Kobashigawa JA;
    Clin Transplant; 2008; 22(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 18702660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of tolerability and ability to increase immunosuppression in renal transplant patients converted from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium.
    Bilodeau JF; Montambault P; Wolff JL; Lemire J; Masse M
    Transplant Proc; 2009 Nov; 41(9):3683-9. PubMed ID: 19917367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety and efficacy after conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium: results of a 1-year extension study.
    Budde K; Knoll G; Curtis J; Kahana L; Pohanka E; Seifu Y; Neumayer HH
    Transplant Proc; 2005 Mar; 37(2):912-5. PubMed ID: 15848573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in maintenance renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus: clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic outcomes.
    Budde K; Glander P; Krämer BK; Fischer W; Hoffmann U; Bauer S; Grohmann J; Neumayer HH; Arns W
    Transplantation; 2007 Feb; 83(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 17318074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.
    Rangel EB; Melaragno CS; Sá JR; Gonzalez AM; Linhares MM; Salzedas A; Medina-Pestana JO
    Transplant Proc; 2009 Dec; 41(10):4265-9. PubMed ID: 20005381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in primary renal transplantation with tacrolimus and steroid avoidance: four-year analysis.
    Ciancio G; Gaynor JJ; Zarak A; Sageshima J; Guerra G; Roth D; Brown R; Kupin W; Chen L; Tueros L; Hanson L; Ruiz P; Burke GW
    Transplantation; 2011 Jun; 91(11):1198-205. PubMed ID: 21107305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of life in renal transplant recipients following conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium.
    Cofan F; Rosich E; Arias M; Torregrosa V; Oppenheimer F; Campistol JM
    Transplant Proc; 2007 Sep; 39(7):2179-81. PubMed ID: 17889130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Good outcomes with cyclosporine very low exposure with everolimus high exposure in renal transplant patients.
    Bertoni E; Larti A; Rosso G; Zanazzi M; Di Maria L; Salvadori M
    J Nephrol; 2011; 24(5):613-8. PubMed ID: 21240873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Similar efficacy and safety of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, myfortic) compared with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in de novo heart transplant recipients: results of a 12-month, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study.
    Kobashigawa JA; Renlund DG; Gerosa G; Almenar L; Eisen HJ; Keogh AM; Lehmkuhl HB; Livi U; Ross H; Segovia J; Yonan N;
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2006 Aug; 25(8):935-41. PubMed ID: 16890114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.