These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. What matched comparisons can and cannot tell us: the case of cochlear implants. Sagi E; Fitzgerald MB; Svirsky MA Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):571-9. PubMed ID: 17609617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Speech discrimination in post-lingually deaf patients with cochlear implants]. Gstoettner W; Adunka O; Hamzavi J; Lautischer M; Baumgartner WD Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):487-91. PubMed ID: 10890126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the performance of post-lingually deafened patients with Nurotron(®) Venus™ cochlear implants. Li J; Ji F; Chen W; Zhao H; Han D; Yang S Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jun; 134(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 24720340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of older adult cochlear implant users in Hong Kong. Chan V; Tong M; Yue V; Wong T; Leung E; Yuen K; van Hasselt A Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):52S-55S. PubMed ID: 17496647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a tactile aid and a cochlear implant in one child. Hesketh LJ; Fryauf-Bertschy H; Osberger MJ Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():183-7. PubMed ID: 2069180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of speech perception performance between Sprint/Esprit 3G and Freedom processors in children implanted with nucleus cochlear implants. Santarelli R; Magnavita V; De Filippi R; Ventura L; Genovese E; Arslan E Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 19225440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech perception of children using Nucleus, Clarion or Med-El cochlear implants. Taitelbaum-Swead R; Kishon-Rabin L; Kaplan-Neeman R; Muchnik C; Kronenberg J; Hildesheimer M Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1675-83. PubMed ID: 15955572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Results with the currently used cochlear implant. Ito J; Takagi A; Kawano M; Takahashi H; Honjo I Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():298-300. PubMed ID: 7668678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants]. Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear implant hearing performance at the University of Minnesota. Kimberley BP; Lee A; Scheller L; Levine S; Adams G; Nelson DA J Otolaryngol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 2921782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of FM-receiver gain on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants. Schafer EC; Wolfe J; Lawless T; Stout B Int J Audiol; 2009 Apr; 48(4):196-203. PubMed ID: 19363720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the benefits of cochlear implants in an education setting. Geers AE; Moog JS Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():116-25. PubMed ID: 2069172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]