These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20447121)

  • 1. Value of dual biometry in the detection and investigation of error in the preoperative prediction of refractive status following cataract surgery.
    Charalampidou S; Dooley I; Molloy L; Beatty S
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 38(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 20447121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoperative optical refractive biometry for intraocular lens power estimation without axial length and keratometry measurements.
    Ianchulev T; Salz J; Hoffer K; Albini T; Hsu H; Labree L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1530-6. PubMed ID: 16129287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of refractive outcomes using immersion ultrasound biometry and IOLMaster biometry.
    Landers J; Goggin M
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 37(6):566-9. PubMed ID: 19702705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of IOL calculations in children: a comparison of immersion versus contact A-scan biometery.
    Ben-Zion I; Neely DE; Plager DA; Ofner S; Sprunger DT; Roberts GJ
    J AAPOS; 2008 Oct; 12(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 18599330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of contact and immersion techniques of ultrasound biometry in terms of target postoperative refraction].
    Hrebcová J; Skorkovská S; Vasků A
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Jul; 65(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 19750832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation: Comparison of Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry and Immersion Ultrasound Biometry.
    Turhan SA; Toker E
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jul; 41(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 26114979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative measurements of optical low-coherence reflectometry biometry and assessment of its refractive predictability.
    Akalın İ; Tüfek M; Türkyılmaz M; Öztürk F
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 39(6):1337-1343. PubMed ID: 29931570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Quality assurance in biometry before cataract surgery: which patients have an increased risk of aberrance from target refraction?].
    Hayek S; Kniestedt C; Barthelmes D; Stürmer J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Apr; 224(4):244-8. PubMed ID: 17458784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of postoperative refractive outcomes: IOLMaster® versus immersion ultrasound.
    Whang WJ; Jung BJ; Oh TH; Byun YS; Joo CK
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2012; 43(6):496-9. PubMed ID: 22869383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biometric calculation of intraocular lens power for cataract surgery following pupil dilatation.
    Bansal S; Quah SA; Turpin T; Batterbury M
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 36(2):156-8. PubMed ID: 18352872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Ocular axial length and refractive changes in pediatric pseudophakia].
    Zhou J; Zhou L; Wu Y; Hu D; Hui Y
    Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2000 Dec; 16(4):270-5. PubMed ID: 12579788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometry: clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype II.
    Kiss B; Findl O; Menapace R; Wirtitsch M; Petternel V; Drexler W; Rainer G; Georgopoulos M; Hitzenberger CK; Fercher AF
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Feb; 28(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 11821201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting the predictability of SRK II in patients with normal axial length undergoing phacoemulsification surgery.
    Lim LH; Lee SY; Ang CL
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Feb; 50(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 19296025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Refractive error after cataract surgery combined with descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
    de Sanctis U; Damiani F; Brusasco L; Grignolo F
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 156(2):254-259.e1. PubMed ID: 23870359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of postoperative refractive outcome in phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.
    Chan JC; Lai JS; Tham CC
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Feb; 15(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 16378014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Refractive and visual outcome of hyperopic cataract cases operated on before and after implementation of the Holladay II formula.
    Fenzl RE; Gills JP; Cherchio M
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Sep; 105(9):1759-64. PubMed ID: 9754188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of intraocular lens power prediction using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T formulas.
    Narváez J; Zimmerman G; Stulting RD; Chang DH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2050-3. PubMed ID: 17137982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery: Scheimpflug keratometry versus standard automated keratometry in virgin corneas.
    Lam S; Gupta BK; Hahn JM; Manastersky NA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1984-7. PubMed ID: 21889873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The correlation of corneal refractive power, axial length, and the refractive power of the emmetropizing intraocular lens in cataractous eyes.
    Sayegh FN
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1996 Nov; 5(6):328-31. PubMed ID: 9479513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in paediatric cataract surgery.
    Tromans C; Haigh PM; Biswas S; Lloyd IC
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Aug; 85(8):939-41. PubMed ID: 11466250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.