These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20447620)

  • 41. Attention alters the appearance of spatial frequency and gap size.
    Gobell J; Carrasco M
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Aug; 16(8):644-51. PubMed ID: 16102068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Selective modulations of attentional asymmetries after sleep deprivation.
    Schmitz R; Deliens G; Mary A; Urbain C; Peigneux P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3351-60. PubMed ID: 21871469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Measuring attentional bias to threat in children and adolescents: a matter of speed?
    Van Damme S; Crombez G
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2009 Jun; 40(2):344-51. PubMed ID: 19243739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The centre is not in the middle: evidence from line and word bisection.
    Arduino LS; Previtali P; Girelli L
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2140-6. PubMed ID: 20385154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention.
    Müller MM
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Visual rightward spatial bias varies as a function of age.
    Takio F; Koivisto M; Tuominen T; Laukka SJ; Hämäläinen H
    Laterality; 2013; 18(1):44-67. PubMed ID: 23231544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of visual signals on spatial decision making.
    Danziger S; Rafal R
    Cognition; 2009 Feb; 110(2):182-97. PubMed ID: 19121825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Near, yet so far: the effect of pictorial cues on spatial attention.
    Nicholls ME; Forte JD; Loetscher T; Orr CA; Yates MJ; Bradshaw JL
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Aug; 76(3):349-52. PubMed ID: 21616572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Linking time-on-task, spatial bias and hemispheric activation asymmetry: a neural correlate of rightward attention drift.
    Newman DP; O'Connell RG; Bellgrove MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1215-23. PubMed ID: 23583973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Age-related changes in visual pseudoneglect.
    Schmitz R; Peigneux P
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Aug; 76(3):382-9. PubMed ID: 21536360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Lower-right and upper-left biases within upper and lower visual fields in a circular array task.
    Szelest I; Elias LJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Dec; 119(3):861-79. PubMed ID: 25375827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
    Sosa Y; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McCourt ME
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20566234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Spatial attention: differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes.
    Benwell CS; Thut G; Learmonth G; Harvey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2747-56. PubMed ID: 24076376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Beyond time and space: The effect of a lateralized sustained attention task and brain stimulation on spatial and selective attention.
    Shalev N; De Wandel L; Dockree P; Demeyere N; Chechlacz M
    Cortex; 2018 Oct; 107():131-147. PubMed ID: 29061290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.
    Learmonth G; Gallagher A; Gibson J; Thut G; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138379. PubMed ID: 26378925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Attentional and perceptual asymmetries in an immersive decision-making task.
    Klatt S; Ford PR; Smeeton NJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1847-1857. PubMed ID: 31808113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Spatial cues affect mental number line bisections.
    Nicholls ME; McIlroy AM
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 20178955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The asymmetrical influence of increasing time-on-task on attentional disengagement.
    Paladini RE; Diana L; Nyffeler T; Mosimann UP; Nef T; Müri RM; Cazzoli D
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Nov; 92():107-114. PubMed ID: 26945506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.