BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

611 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20448246)

  • 1. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials.
    Busscher HJ; Rinastiti M; Siswomihardjo W; van der Mei HC
    J Dent Res; 2010 Jul; 89(7):657-65. PubMed ID: 20448246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development.
    Teughels W; Van Assche N; Sliepen I; Quirynen M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():68-81. PubMed ID: 16968383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature.
    Subramani K; Jung RE; Molenberg A; Hammerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 19885401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Material Properties on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation.
    Song F; Koo H; Ren D
    J Dent Res; 2015 Aug; 94(8):1027-34. PubMed ID: 26001706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The influence of cell surface hydrophobicity Candida sp. on biofilm formation on different biomaterials].
    Ciok-Pater E; Gospodarek E; Prazyńska M; Bogiel T
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2009; 61(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 20120930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface free energy and bacterial retention to saliva-coated dental implant materials--an in vitro study.
    Mabboux F; Ponsonnet L; Morrier JJ; Jaffrezic N; Barsotti O
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2004 Dec; 39(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 15555904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of biomaterial surface chemistry on the adhesion and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis in vitro.
    MacKintosh EE; Patel JD; Marchant RE; Anderson JM
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Sep; 78(4):836-42. PubMed ID: 16817192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. S. epidermidis biofilm formation: effects of biomaterial surface chemistry and serum proteins.
    Patel JD; Ebert M; Ward R; Anderson JM
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Mar; 80(3):742-51. PubMed ID: 17177270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro and in vivo comparisons of staphylococcal biofilm formation on a cross-linked poly(ethylene glycol)-based polymer coating.
    Saldarriaga Fernández IC; Mei HC; Metzger S; Grainger DW; Engelsman AF; Nejadnik MR; Busscher HJ
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Mar; 6(3):1119-24. PubMed ID: 19733265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro study of biofilm formation and effectiveness of antimicrobial treatment on various dental material surfaces.
    Li L; Finnegan MB; Özkan S; Kim Y; Lillehoj PB; Ho CM; Lux R; Mito R; Loewy Z; Shi W
    Mol Oral Microbiol; 2010 Dec; 25(6):384-90. PubMed ID: 21040512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Investigation of the surface properties of Staphylococcus epidermidis strains isolated from biomaterials].
    Sudağidan M; Erdem I; Cavuşoğlu C; Ciftçloğlu M
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2010 Jan; 44(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 20455404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early biofilm formation and the effects of antimicrobial agents on orthodontic bonding materials in a parallel plate flow chamber.
    Chin MY; Busscher HJ; Evans R; Noar J; Pratten J
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16373451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo and in vitro biofilm formation on two different titanium implant surfaces.
    Bürgers R; Gerlach T; Hahnel S; Schwarz F; Handel G; Gosau M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 19912269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anti-biofilm activity of zinc oxide and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as dental implant coating materials.
    Abdulkareem EH; Memarzadeh K; Allaker RP; Huang J; Pratten J; Spratt D
    J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1462-9. PubMed ID: 26497232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anti-biofilm properties of chitosan-coated surfaces.
    Carlson RP; Taffs R; Davison WM; Stewart PS
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2008; 19(8):1035-46. PubMed ID: 18644229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to uncoated and saliva-coated glass-ceramics and composites.
    Kantorski KZ; Scotti R; Valandro LF; Bottino MA; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(7):740-7; quiz 748-9, 768. PubMed ID: 19014037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevention of biofilm formation on titanium surfaces modified with conjugated molecules comprised of antimicrobial and titanium-binding peptides.
    Yoshinari M; Kato T; Matsuzaka K; Hayakawa T; Shiba K
    Biofouling; 2010 Jan; 26(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 20390560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on dental restorative materials.
    Montanaro L; Campoccia D; Rizzi S; Donati ME; Breschi L; Prati C; Arciola CR
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(18):4457-63. PubMed ID: 15046936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analyses of biofilms accumulated on dental restorative materials.
    de Fúcio SB; Puppin-Rontani RM; de Carvalho FG; Mattos-Graner Rde O; Correr-Sobrinho L; Garcia-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2009 Jun; 22(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 19650591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis of microorganism species succession on three implant surfaces with different roughness: an in vivo study.
    de Freitas MM; da Silva CH; Groisman M; Vidigal GM
    Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):e14-23. PubMed ID: 21448015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.