These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20449530)

  • 41. An objective measure of physical activity for epidemiologic research.
    LaPorte RE; Kuller LH; Kupfer DJ; McPartland RJ; Matthews G; Caspersen C
    Am J Epidemiol; 1979 Feb; 109(2):158-68. PubMed ID: 425955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Physiological acoustic sensing based on accelerometers: a survey for mobile healthcare.
    Hu Y; Kim EG; Cao G; Liu S; Xu Y
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2014 Nov; 42(11):2264-77. PubMed ID: 25234130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A methodological model for collecting high-quality data on physical activity in developing settings-the experience of the 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort study.
    Reichert FF; Menezes AM; Kingdom Wells JC; Ekelund E; Rodrigues FM; Hallal PC
    J Phys Act Health; 2009 May; 6(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 19564666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. "Behind the Scenes" of Accelerometer Use to Quantify In-Hospital Mobility of Older Adults.
    Levin C; Zisberg A; Gil E; Rand D; Agmon M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Aug; 103(8):1676-1683.e1. PubMed ID: 35085570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Best practices for using physical activity monitors in population-based research.
    Matthews CE; Hagströmer M; Pober DM; Bowles HR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Jan; 44(1 Suppl 1):S68-76. PubMed ID: 22157777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Translating accelerometer counts into energy expenditure: advancing the quest.
    Troiano RP
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2006 Apr; 100(4):1107-8. PubMed ID: 16540708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Young People's Views on Accelerometer Use in Physical Activity Research: Findings from a User Involvement Investigation.
    Kirby J; Tibbins C; Callens C; Lang B; Thorogood M; Tigbe W; Robertson W
    ISRN Obes; 2012; 2012():948504. PubMed ID: 24533214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The need for energy equilibrium.
    Flouris AD; Klentrou P
    J Sci Med Sport; 2005 Jun; 8(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 16075772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Reliability, validity, and methodological issues in assessing physical activity in older adults.
    Rikli RE
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2000 Jun; 71 Suppl 2():89-96. PubMed ID: 25680018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessment of energy expenditure for physical activity using a triaxial accelerometer.
    Bouten CV; Westerterp KR; Verduin M; Janssen JD
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Dec; 26(12):1516-23. PubMed ID: 7869887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Accelerometer-based measures in physical activity surveillance: current practices and issues.
    Pedišić Ž; Bauman A
    Br J Sports Med; 2015 Feb; 49(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 25370153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Daily physical activity assessment with accelerometers: new insights and validation studies.
    Plasqui G; Bonomi AG; Westerterp KR
    Obes Rev; 2013 Jun; 14(6):451-62. PubMed ID: 23398786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. ActiGraph and Actical physical activity monitors: a peek under the hood.
    John D; Freedson P
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Jan; 44(1 Suppl 1):S86-9. PubMed ID: 22157779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of steps and energy expenditure assessment in adults of Fitbit Tracker and Ultra to the Actical and indirect calorimetry.
    Adam Noah J; Spierer DK; Gu J; Bronner S
    J Med Eng Technol; 2013 Oct; 37(7):456-62. PubMed ID: 24007317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Measuring and influencing physical activity with smartphone technology: a systematic review.
    Bort-Roig J; Gilson ND; Puig-Ribera A; Contreras RS; Trost SG
    Sports Med; 2014 May; 44(5):671-86. PubMed ID: 24497157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Validity of an Accelerometer-Based Activity Monitor System for Measuring Physical Activity in Frail Older Adults.
    Hollewand AM; Spijkerman AG; Bilo HJ; Kleefstra N; Kamsma Y; van Hateren KJ
    J Aging Phys Act; 2016 Oct; 24(4):555-558. PubMed ID: 26964560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Fitbit®: An accurate and reliable device for wireless physical activity tracking.
    Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Peacock J; Ma Y; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE; Davidson KW
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 185():138-40. PubMed ID: 25795203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An evaluation of energy expenditure estimation by three activity monitors.
    Ryan J; Gormley J
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2013; 13(6):681-8. PubMed ID: 24251746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Validation of the Fitbit wireless activity tracker for prediction of energy expenditure.
    Sasaki JE; Hickey A; Mavilia M; Tedesco J; John D; Kozey Keadle S; Freedson PS
    J Phys Act Health; 2015 Feb; 12(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24770438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers.
    Ellis K; Kerr J; Godbole S; Lanckriet G; Wing D; Marshall S
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2191-203. PubMed ID: 25340969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.