190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20449636)
21. Misuse of Regression Adjustment for Additional Confounders Following Insufficient Propensity Score Balancing.
Shinozaki T; Nojima M
Epidemiology; 2019 Jul; 30(4):541-548. PubMed ID: 31166216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Identification of natural direct effects when a confounder of the mediator is directly affected by exposure.
Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Vanderweele TJ
Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):282-91. PubMed ID: 24487211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does exposure prediction bias health-effect estimation?: The relationship between confounding adjustment and exposure prediction.
Cefalu M; Dominici F
Epidemiology; 2014 Jul; 25(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 24815302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Matching in observational research: from the directed acyclic graph perspective].
Luo T; Wang L; Tian T; Fu WH; Pei HL; Zheng YJ; Dai JH
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 42(4):740-744. PubMed ID: 34814461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Causal inference based on counterfactuals.
Höfler M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Sep; 5():28. PubMed ID: 16159397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounders for credible and reliable real-world evidence.
Zhang X; Stamey JD; Mathur MB
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1219-1227. PubMed ID: 32929830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Propensity score calibration in the absence of surrogacy.
Lunt M; Glynn RJ; Rothman KJ; Avorn J; Stürmer T
Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 175(12):1294-302. PubMed ID: 22688682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Using computable knowledge mined from the literature to elucidate confounders for EHR-based pharmacovigilance.
Malec SA; Wei P; Bernstam EV; Boyce RD; Cohen T
J Biomed Inform; 2021 May; 117():103719. PubMed ID: 33716168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Directed acyclic graphs: a tool for causal studies in paediatrics.
Williams TC; Bach CC; Matthiesen NB; Henriksen TB; Gagliardi L
Pediatr Res; 2018 Oct; 84(4):487-493. PubMed ID: 29967527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [How to adjust confounders in studies on observational comparative effectiveness: (3) approaches on sensitivity analysis for confounder adjustment].
Huang LL; Zhao Y; Wei YY; Chen F
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 40(12):1645-1649. PubMed ID: 32062931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Causal inference accounting for unobserved confounding after outcome regression and doubly robust estimation.
Genbäck M; de Luna X
Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):506-515. PubMed ID: 30430543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Interrogating Bias: Reflections on Hernán et al. 20 Years Later.
Levy NS; Keyes KM
Am J Epidemiol; 2023 Nov; 192(11):1797-1800. PubMed ID: 34791035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Single-arm Trials With External Comparators and Confounder Misclassification: How Adjustment Can Fail.
Webster-Clark M; Jonsson Funk M; Stürmer T
Med Care; 2020 Dec; 58(12):1116-1121. PubMed ID: 32925456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Results on differential and dependent measurement error of the exposure and the outcome using signed directed acyclic graphs.
VanderWeele TJ; Hernán MA
Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 175(12):1303-10. PubMed ID: 22569106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data.
Hernán MA; Robins JM
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Jul; 60(7):578-86. PubMed ID: 16790829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Double bias: estimation of causal effects from length-biased samples in the presence of confounding.
Ertefaie A; Asgharian M; Stephens DA
Int J Biostat; 2015 May; 11(1):69-89. PubMed ID: 25803086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies.
Schisterman EF; Cole SR; Platt RW
Epidemiology; 2009 Jul; 20(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 19525685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bounds for pure direct effect.
Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Phiri K
Epidemiology; 2014 Sep; 25(5):775-6. PubMed ID: 25076155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Frameworks for estimating causal effects in observational settings: comparing confounder adjustment and instrumental variables.
Zawadzki RS; Grill JD; Gillen DL;
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 May; 23(1):122. PubMed ID: 37217854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. To Adjust or Not to Adjust: The Role of Different Covariates in Cardiovascular Observational Studies.
Etminan M; Brophy JM; Collins G; Nazemipour M; Mansournia MA
Am Heart J; 2021 Jul; 237():62-67. PubMed ID: 33722586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
