These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20449636)

  • 61. Causal inference based on counterfactuals.
    Höfler M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Sep; 5():28. PubMed ID: 16159397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Fallibility in estimating direct effects.
    Cole SR; Hernán MA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 31(1):163-5. PubMed ID: 11914314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Principles of confounder selection.
    VanderWeele TJ
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 34(3):211-219. PubMed ID: 30840181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. A proposed clinical and biological interpretation of mediated interaction.
    Ikram MA; VanderWeele TJ
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1115-8. PubMed ID: 26438385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Invited commentary: positivity in practice.
    Westreich D; Cole SR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 171(6):674-7; discussion 678-81. PubMed ID: 20139125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A Comparison of Agent-Based Models and the Parametric G-Formula for Causal Inference.
    Murray EJ; Robins JM; Seage GR; Freedberg KA; Hernán MA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 186(2):131-142. PubMed ID: 28838064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Adjustment for unmeasured confounding through informative priors for the confounder-outcome relation.
    Groenwold RHH; Shofty I; Miočević M; van Smeden M; Klugkist I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):174. PubMed ID: 30577773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology.
    Robins JM; Hernán MA; Brumback B
    Epidemiology; 2000 Sep; 11(5):550-60. PubMed ID: 10955408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Assessing the total effect of time-varying predictors in prevention research.
    Bray BC; Almirall D; Zimmerman RS; Lynam D; Murphy SA
    Prev Sci; 2006 Mar; 7(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 16489417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Natural direct and indirect effects on the exposed: effect decomposition under weaker assumptions.
    Vansteelandt S; Vanderweele TJ
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1019-27. PubMed ID: 22989075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to identify confounders in applied health research: review and recommendations.
    Tennant PWG; Murray EJ; Arnold KF; Berrie L; Fox MP; Gadd SC; Harrison WJ; Keeble C; Ranker LR; Textor J; Tomova GD; Gilthorpe MS; Ellison GTH
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 May; 50(2):620-632. PubMed ID: 33330936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. How to compare instrumental variable and conventional regression analyses using negative controls and bias plots.
    Davies NM; Thomas KH; Taylor AE; Taylor GMJ; Martin RM; Munafò MR; Windmeijer F
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 46(6):2067-2077. PubMed ID: 28398582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions.
    Ding P; VanderWeele TJ
    Epidemiology; 2016 May; 27(3):368-77. PubMed ID: 26841057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Quantitative falsification of instrumental variables assumption using balance measures.
    Ali MS; Uddin MJ; Groenwold RH; Pestman WR; Belitser SV; Hoes AW; de Boer A; Roes KC; Klungel OH
    Epidemiology; 2014 Sep; 25(5):770-2. PubMed ID: 25076152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A comparison of methods to estimate the survivor average causal effect in the presence of missing data: a simulation study.
    McGuinness MB; Kasza J; Karahalios A; Guymer RH; Finger RP; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):223. PubMed ID: 31795945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Theorems, proofs, examples, and rules in the practice of epidemiology.
    Vanderweele TJ; Ogburnb EL
    Epidemiology; 2012 May; 23(3):443-5. PubMed ID: 22475829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Using compartmental models to simulate directed acyclic graphs to explore competing causal mechanisms underlying epidemiological study data.
    Havumaki J; Eisenberg MC
    J R Soc Interface; 2020 Jun; 17(167):20190675. PubMed ID: 32574536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
    Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Educational Note: Paradoxical collider effect in the analysis of non-communicable disease epidemiological data: a reproducible illustration and web application.
    Luque-Fernandez MA; Schomaker M; Redondo-Sanchez D; Jose Sanchez Perez M; Vaidya A; Schnitzer ME
    Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 48(2):640-653. PubMed ID: 30561628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. More (Adjustment) Is Not Always Better: How Directed Acyclic Graphs Can Help Researchers Decide Which Covariates to Include in Models for the Causal Relationship between an Exposure and an Outcome in Observational Research.
    Diemer EW; Hudson JI; Javaras KN
    Psychother Psychosom; 2021; 90(5):289-298. PubMed ID: 34252900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.