These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2045001)
1. [Pro and contra episiotomy]. Hirsch HA Gynakologe; 1991 Feb; 24(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 2045001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Anal sphincter injury and episiotomy. Goer H Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):341-2. PubMed ID: 17150075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Operative vaginal delivery and episiotomy. Murphy DJ; Macleod M; Bahl R; Strachan B BJOG; 2008 Jul; 115(8):1065; author reply 1066. PubMed ID: 18651896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case-control study. Kalis V; Kettle C; Raisanen SH; de Leeuw JW; Jundt K; de Tayrac R; Jansova M; Ismail KM; BJOG; 2012 Aug; 119(9):1147; author reply 1148-9. PubMed ID: 22780819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Avoiding episiotomy is the best strategy to prevent OASIS: response to the article 'episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case-control study'. Knobel R; Takemoto ML; Jones RH; Amorim MM BJOG; 2012 Aug; 119(9):1148; author reply 1148-9. PubMed ID: 22780821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. de Leeuw JW; de Wit C; Kuijken JP; Bruinse HW BJOG; 2008 Jan; 115(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 17999693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study. Andrews V; Sultan AH; Thakar R; Jones PW Birth; 2006 Jun; 33(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 16732776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study. Murphy DJ; Macleod M; Bahl R; Goyder K; Howarth L; Strachan B BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1695-702; discussion 1702-3. PubMed ID: 19035944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. Macleod M; Strachan B; Bahl R; Howarth L; Goyder K; Van de Venne M; Murphy DJ BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1688-94. PubMed ID: 19035943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Fecal incontinence: prevalence and role of anal sphincter rupture during labor; review of literature]. de Leeuw JW; Vierhout ME Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Aug; 144(33):1609. PubMed ID: 10965373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury? Eogan M; Daly L; O'Connell PR; O'Herlihy C BJOG; 2006 Feb; 113(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 16411997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminology. Kalis V; Laine K; de Leeuw JW; Ismail KM; Tincello DG BJOG; 2012 Apr; 119(5):522-6. PubMed ID: 22304364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Angle of mediolateral episiotomy using the ischial tuberosity as a reference point. Karbanova J; Landsmanova J; Novotny Z Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Nov; 107(2):157. PubMed ID: 19576585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Are mediolateral episiotomies actually mediolateral? Andrews V; Thakar R; Sultan AH; Jones PW BJOG; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1156-8. PubMed ID: 16045535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence. A prospective study is needed. Boer K BMJ; 2000 Jun; 320(7249):1601. PubMed ID: 10896429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of mediolateral episiotomy during labour: analysis of risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter tears. Aukee P; Sundström H; Kairaluoma MV Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(7):856-60. PubMed ID: 16817086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Uncomplicated obstetric injury as a risk factor for anal incontinence? Objective assessment of manometric measurements]. Franz HB; Schneider D; Benda N; Erz W; Neuer A; Gonser M Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1999; 203(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 10427669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anal incontinence: a reappraisal. Moore FA Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Apr; 41(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 4696963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]