192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20450359)
1. Ten-year results after connective tissue grafts and guided tissue regeneration for root coverage.
Nickles K; Ratka-Krüger P; Neukranz E; Raetzke P; Eickholz P
J Periodontol; 2010 Jun; 81(6):827-36. PubMed ID: 20450359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative clinical study of guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable bilayer collagen membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Romagna-Genon C
J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1258-64. PubMed ID: 11577960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment of gingival recession: comparative study between subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration.
Rosetti EP; Marcantonio RA; Rossa C; Chaves ES; Goissis G; Marcantonio E
J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1441-7. PubMed ID: 11022773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gingival recession treatment: guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane versus connective tissue graft.
Tatakis DN; Trombelli L
J Periodontol; 2000 Feb; 71(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 10711621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative clinical study of connective tissue graft and two types of bioabsorbable barriers in the treatment of localized gingival recessions.
Cetiner D; Parlar A; Baloş K; Alpar R
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1196-205. PubMed ID: 14514234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative clinical study of a bioabsorbable membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of human gingival recession.
Borghetti A; Glise JM; Monnet-Corti V; Dejou J
J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10102549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Failure of root coverage of shallow gingival recessions employing GTR and a bioresorbable membrane.
Müller HP; Stahl M; Eger T
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Apr; 21(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 11829391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Twenty-year results after connective tissue grafts and guided tissue regeneration for root coverage.
Petsos H; Eickholz P; Ratka-Krüger P; Neukranz E; Nickles K
J Periodontol; 2020 Mar; 91(3):377-386. PubMed ID: 31453640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative research concerning clinical efficiency of three surgical methods of periodontium recessions treatment in five-year observations.
Dominiak M; Konopka T; Lompart H; Kubasiewicz P
Adv Med Sci; 2006; 51 Suppl 1():18-25. PubMed ID: 17458054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Root coverage stability of the subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration: a 30-month follow-up clinical trial.
Rosetti EP; Marcantonio E; Zuza EP; Marcantonio RA
J Dent; 2013 Feb; 41(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 22652007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects.
Zucchelli G; Clauser C; De Sanctis M; Calandriello M
J Periodontol; 1998 Feb; 69(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 9526912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession defects.
Trombelli L; Scabbia A; Tatakis DN; Calura G
J Periodontol; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1271-7. PubMed ID: 9848537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinical/statistical comparison between the subpedicle connective tissue graft method and the guided tissue regeneration technique in root coverage.
Ricci G; Silvestri M; Tinti C; Rasperini G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Dec; 16(6):538-45. PubMed ID: 9242092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.
Alkan EA; Parlar A
J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession.
Wang HL; Bunyaratavej P; Labadie M; Shyr Y; MacNeil RL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1301-11. PubMed ID: 11699470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A preliminary comparative study of the guided tissue regeneration and free gingival graft procedures for adjacent facial root coverage.
Ito K; Oshio K; Shiomi N; Murai S
Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):319-26. PubMed ID: 11203942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment of human class II furcation defects using connective tissue grafts, bioabsorbable membrane, and resorbable hydroxylapatite: a comparative study.
Belal MH; Al-Noamany FA; El-Tonsy MM; El-Guindy HM; Ishikawa I
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Oct; 7(4):114-28. PubMed ID: 16245642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of enamel matrix derivative on collagen guided tissue regeneration-based root coverage procedure.
Trabulsi M; Oh TJ; Eber R; Weber D; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 75(11):1446-57. PubMed ID: 15633319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 10 years.
McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):1353-62. PubMed ID: 22348698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
