These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20451214)

  • 21. Critical frequencies in the perception of letters, faces, and novel shapes: evidence for limited scale invariance for faces.
    Oruç I; Barton JJ
    J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):20. PubMed ID: 21047752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electrophysiological neural mechanisms for detection, configural analysis and recognition of faces.
    Anaki D; Zion-Golumbic E; Bentin S
    Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 37(4):1407-16. PubMed ID: 17689102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies.
    Goffaux V; Rossion B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1023-39. PubMed ID: 16846295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Learning task affects ERP-correlates of the own-race bias, but not recognition memory performance.
    Stahl J; Wiese H; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2027-40. PubMed ID: 20362599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 18-Month-olds can perceive Mooney faces.
    Doi H; Koga T; Shinohara K
    Neurosci Res; 2009 Jul; 64(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 19428135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Face recognition and cortical responses show similar sensitivity to noise spatial frequency.
    Tanskanen T; Näsänen R; Montez T; Päällysaho J; Hari R
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 May; 15(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 15319307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A spatial frequency account of the detriment that local processing of Navon letters has on face recognition.
    Hills PJ; Lewis MB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1427-42. PubMed ID: 19803647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Why 8-year-olds cannot tell the difference between Steve Martin and Paul Newman: factors contributing to the slow development of sensitivity to the spacing of facial features.
    Mondloch CJ; Dobson KS; Parsons J; Maurer D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Oct; 89(2):159-81. PubMed ID: 15388304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The development of perceptual sensitivity to second-order facial relations in children.
    Baudouin JY; Gallay M; Durand K; Robichon F
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Nov; 107(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 20598706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
    Marzi T; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Early maturity of face recognition: no childhood development of holistic processing, novel face encoding, or face-space.
    Crookes K; McKone E
    Cognition; 2009 May; 111(2):219-47. PubMed ID: 19296930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Age biases in face processing: the effects of experience across development.
    Macchi Cassia V
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 102(4):816-29. PubMed ID: 21988386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces.
    Cheung OS; Richler JJ; Palmeri TJ; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1327-36. PubMed ID: 19045978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceptual biases in processing facial identity and emotion.
    Coolican J; Eskes GA; McMullen PA; Lecky E
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Mar; 66(2):176-87. PubMed ID: 17720290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. No own-age bias in 3-year-old children: more evidence for the role of early experience in building face-processing biases.
    Macchi Cassia V; Pisacane A; Gava L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Nov; 113(3):372-82. PubMed ID: 22857798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants.
    Duchaine B; Nakayama K
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):576-85. PubMed ID: 16169565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perceptual expertise effects are not all or none: spatially limited perceptual expertise for faces in a case of prosopagnosia.
    Bukach CM; Bub DN; Gauthier I; Tarr MJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):48-63. PubMed ID: 16417682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fitting the child's mind to the world: adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity in 8-year-olds.
    Nishimura M; Maurer D; Jeffery L; Pellicano E; Rhodes G
    Dev Sci; 2008 Jul; 11(4):620-7. PubMed ID: 18576969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The time course of social-emotional processing in early childhood: ERP responses to facial affect and personal familiarity in a Go-Nogo task.
    Todd RM; Lewis MD; Meusel LA; Zelazo PD
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):595-613. PubMed ID: 18061633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Expertise and own-race bias in face processing: an event-related potential study.
    Stahl J; Wiese H; Schweinberger SR
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(5):583-7. PubMed ID: 18388743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.