BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20451776)

  • 1. Factors affecting the long-term stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Uemura M; Ono A; Okazaki K; Shigeeda T; Shimizu N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):588.e1-5; discussion 588-9. PubMed ID: 20451776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.
    Wu TY; Kuang SH; Wu CH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1595-9. PubMed ID: 19615569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant.
    Motoyoshi M; Hirabayashi M; Uemura M; Shimizu N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 16441792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Yoshida T; Ono A; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro evaluation of insertion and removal torques of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pithon MM; Nojima MG; Nojima LI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 21050721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A torque removal study on the primary stability of orthodontic titanium screw mini-implants in the cortical bone of dog femurs.
    Okazaki J; Komasa Y; Sakai D; Kamada A; Ikeo T; Toda I; Suwa F; Inoue M; Etoh T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):647-50. PubMed ID: 18554870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading.
    Kim SH; Cho JH; Chung KR; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18617101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Wilmes B; Drescher D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):697-703. PubMed ID: 21458232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microcomputed tomographic analysis of bone reaction at insertion of orthodontic mini-implants in sheep.
    Rebaudi A; Laffi N; Benedicenti S; Angiero F; Romanos GE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1233-40. PubMed ID: 22167428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Insertional torque and axial pull-out strength of mini-implants in mandibles of dogs.
    Salmória KK; Tanaka OM; Guariza-Filho O; Camargo ES; de Souza LT; Maruo H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e15-22. PubMed ID: 18538236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of miniscrew taper morphology on insertion and removal torque in dogs.
    Cha JY; Takano-Yamamoto T; Hwang CJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):777-83. PubMed ID: 20657874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential bone healing of immediately loaded mini-implants.
    Serra G; Morais LS; Elias CN; Meyers MA; Andrade L; Muller C; Muller M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 18617102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orthodontic load on short maxillary implants with reduced sink depth: an experimental study.
    Wehrbein H; Göllner P; Diedrich P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1063-8. PubMed ID: 18828823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal torque of osseointegrated mini-implants: an in vivo evaluation.
    Favero LG; Pisoni A; Paganelli C
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):443-8. PubMed ID: 17974534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of force, timing, and location on bone-to-implant contact of miniscrew implants.
    Woods PW; Buschang PH; Owens SE; Rossouw PE; Opperman LA
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 19073958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants.
    Çehreli S; Arman-Özçırpıcı A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 22284286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Survival analysis of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Lee SJ; Ahn SJ; Lee JW; Kim SH; Kim TW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 20152674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Stability of the miniscrew implant during healing period].
    Wu J; Bai YX; Wang BK; Gao XH
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 41(4):226-7. PubMed ID: 16784589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of mini-implant diameter on fracture risk and self-drilling efficacy.
    Barros SE; Janson G; Chiqueto K; Garib DG; Janson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e181-92. PubMed ID: 21967956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical anchorage evaluation of mini-implants treated with sandblasting and acid etching in orthodontics.
    Calderón JH; Valencia RM; Casasa AA; Sánchez MA; Espinosa R; Ceja I
    Implant Dent; 2011 Aug; 20(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 21785362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.