426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20451778)
1. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Low C; Flores-Mir C; Chung R; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 20451778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
Cattaneo PM; Bloch CB; Calmar D; Hjortshøj M; Melsen B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) - generated frontal cephalograms.
Kim SJ; Park SB; Kim YI; Cho BH; Hwang DS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e331-6. PubMed ID: 22444351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
Baumgaertel S; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT.
Naji P; Alsufyani NA; Lagravère MO
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):762-72. PubMed ID: 24364751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the reliability and repeatability of landmarks using 3-D cephalometric software.
Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco AA; Crincoli V; Debernardi CL; Bracco P
Cranio; 2012 Oct; 30(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23156966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision and accuracy of suggested maxillary and mandibular landmarks with cone-beam computed tomography for regional superimpositions: An in vitro study.
Lemieux G; Carey JP; Flores-Mir C; Secanell M; Hart A; Lagravère MO
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 26718380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms.
Chang ZC; Hu FC; Lai E; Yao CC; Chen MH; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e289-97. PubMed ID: 22133963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between two-dimensional and midsagittal three-dimensional cephalometric measurements of dry human skulls.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Ren Y
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 49(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 20615593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.
Ludlow JB; Gubler M; Cevidanes L; Mol A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):312.e1-10; discussion 312-3. PubMed ID: 19732656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments.
Lagravère MO; Gordon JM; Guedes IH; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1047-56. PubMed ID: 19852593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital tooth-based superimposition method for assessment of alveolar bone levels on cone-beam computed tomography images.
Romero-Delmastro A; Kadioglu O; Currier GF; Cook T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Aug; 146(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 25085309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of cephalometric landmark identification on CBCT multiplanar and 3D reconstructions.
Neiva MB; Soares ÁC; Lisboa Cde O; Vilella Ode V; Motta AT
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24713068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
Chien PC; Parks ET; Eraso F; Hartsfield JK; Roberts WE; Ofner S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jul; 38(5):262-73. PubMed ID: 19474253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated cephalometry: system performance reliability using landmark-dependent criteria.
Tanikawa C; Yagi M; Takada K
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19852592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images.
Yu SH; Nahm DS; Baek SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e1-6; discussion e1. PubMed ID: 18538235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: a comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system.
Metzger TE; Kula KS; Eckert GJ; Ghoneima AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 24182583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
