344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20452440)
1. The influence of the diffusion of responsibility effect on outcome evaluations: electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study.
Li P; Jia S; Feng T; Liu Q; Suo T; Li H
Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1727-33. PubMed ID: 20452440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpersonal relationship modulates brain responses to outcome evaluation when gambling for/against others: an electrophysiological analysis.
Leng Y; Zhou X
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():205-14. PubMed ID: 25218954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome evaluations in group decision making using the majority rule: an electrophysiological study.
Kimura K; Katayama J
Psychophysiology; 2013 Sep; 50(9):848-57. PubMed ID: 23758326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Responsibility modulates neural mechanisms of outcome processing: an ERP study.
Li P; Han C; Lei Y; Holroyd CB; Li H
Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1129-33. PubMed ID: 21729102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An electrophysiological monetary incentive delay (e-MID) task: a way to decompose the different components of neural response to positive and negative monetary reinforcement.
Broyd SJ; Richards HJ; Helps SK; Chronaki G; Bamford S; Sonuga-Barke EJ
J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Jul; 209(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 22659003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feedback and reward processing in high-functioning autism.
Larson MJ; South M; Krauskopf E; Clawson A; Crowley MJ
Psychiatry Res; 2011 May; 187(1-2):198-203. PubMed ID: 21122921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How an uncertain cue modulates subsequent monetary outcome evaluation: an ERP study.
Xu Q; Shen Q; Chen P; Ma Q; Sun D; Pan Y
Neurosci Lett; 2011 Nov; 505(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 22027182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Event-related components of the punishment and reward sensitivity.
De Pascalis V; Varriale V; D'Antuono L
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Jan; 121(1):60-76. PubMed ID: 19900840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The feedback-related negativity (FRN) in adolescents.
Zottoli TM; Grose-Fifer J
Psychophysiology; 2012 Mar; 49(3):413-20. PubMed ID: 22091835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Social value orientation modulates context-based social comparison preference in the outcome evaluation: An ERP study.
Qi Y; Wu H; Raiha S; Liu X
Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():135-144. PubMed ID: 29501790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback-related negativity in the flanker gambling task.
Liu Y; Nelson LD; Bernat EM; Gehring WJ
Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):782-8. PubMed ID: 24673119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How does cognitive reappraisal affect the response to gains and losses?
Yang Q; Gu R; Tang P; Luo YJ
Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1094-103. PubMed ID: 23889144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrophysiological correlates of decision-making in high-risk versus low-risk conditions of a gambling game.
Yang J; Zhang Q
Psychophysiology; 2011 Oct; 48(10):1456-61. PubMed ID: 21913928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Problem gamblers exhibit reward hypersensitivity in medial frontal cortex during gambling.
Oberg SA; Christie GJ; Tata MS
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Nov; 49(13):3768-75. PubMed ID: 21982697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feedback-related negativity effects vanished with false or monetary loss choice.
Li P; Yuan J; Jia S; Feng T; Chen A; Li H
Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):788-92. PubMed ID: 19381114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Self-reflection modulates the outcome evaluation process: Evidence from an ERP study.
Zhu X; Gu R; Wu H; Luo Y
Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Dec; 98(3 Pt 1):389-93. PubMed ID: 26255975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Brain potentials in outcome evaluation: when social comparison takes effect.
Wu Y; Zhang D; Elieson B; Zhou X
Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Aug; 85(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 22705168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attitude toward money modulates outcome processing: an ERP study.
Jia S; Zhang W; Li P; Feng T; Li H
Soc Neurosci; 2013; 8(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 22856426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes.
Hajcak G; Moser JS; Holroyd CB; Simons RF
Biol Psychol; 2006 Feb; 71(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 16005561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The P300 and reward valence, magnitude, and expectancy in outcome evaluation.
Wu Y; Zhou X
Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1286():114-22. PubMed ID: 19539614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
