134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20452537)
1. Editorial comment: legal liability in atypical aortic dissection.
Elefteriades JA
Cardiol Clin; 2010 May; 28(2):253-4. PubMed ID: 20452537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Physicians should be legally liable for missing an atypical aortic dissection: PRO.
Lebovits M
Cardiol Clin; 2010 May; 28(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 20452535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physicians should be legally liable for missing an atypical aortic dissection: CON.
Elefteriades JA
Cardiol Clin; 2010 May; 28(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 20452536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Illnesses with a high mortality rate - compensation after overlooking an aortic dissection].
Thiede A; Zimmermann HJ
Zentralbl Chir; 2010 Oct; 135(5):394-6. PubMed ID: 20976641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. NY: Asymptomatic pt. died from heart attack: judgment for nurse and drs. affirmed. Makinen v. Torelli, 2011-31882 NYMISC (7/7/2011)-NY.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2011 Jul; 52(2):3. PubMed ID: 21842611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Stretching the statute of limitations.
Johnson LJ
Med Econ; 2003 Sep; 80(17):82. PubMed ID: 14521013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical malpractice in England--current trends.
McHale JV
Eur J Health Law; 2003 Jun; 10(2):135-51. PubMed ID: 14635457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prenatal testing gone awry: the birth of a conflict of ethics and liability.
Ackmann EA
Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):199-224. PubMed ID: 17111503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Responding to an accusation of malpractice.
Gunderman RB
J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Mar; 7(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 20193921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):517-22. PubMed ID: 17715094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medicolegal--Malpractice and ethical issues in radiology. Electronic health records and malpractice litigation: malpractice pitfalls.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):W447-8. PubMed ID: 25247975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. MEDIOCOLEGAL--Malpractice and ethical issues in radiology.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):W110. PubMed ID: 25539264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A young woman fainted.
Avery JK
J Tenn Med Assoc; 1996 Mar; 89(3):87-8. PubMed ID: 8838061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal Ramifications of Computer-Aided Detection in Mammography.
Mezrich JL; Siegel EL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jun; 12(6):572-4. PubMed ID: 25547380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Analysis of 21 autopsy cases of aortic dissection with disputes].
Yang SM; Zhang GZ
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 28(6):432-4. PubMed ID: 23484324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physicians' cognitive errors and their liability consequences.
Bartlett EE
J Healthc Risk Manag; 1998; 18(4):62-9. PubMed ID: 10537844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medicolegal-Malpractice and Ethical Issues in Radiology
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Mar; 212(3):W92. PubMed ID: 30793940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Lost chance of survival": the new malpractice risk.
Rice B
Med Econ; 2006 Sep; 83(17):88-90, 92. PubMed ID: 17037425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical malpractice and tort reform.
; Berry MD
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2014 Dec; ():1-40. PubMed ID: 25775714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal risks in treating irritable bowel syndrome.
Feld AD
Rev Gastroenterol Disord; 2003; 3 Suppl 3():S25-31. PubMed ID: 14502114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
