These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20452740)
1. The accuracy of digital infrared imaging for breast cancer detection in women undergoing breast biopsy. Wishart GC; Campisi M; Boswell M; Chapman D; Shackleton V; Iddles S; Hallett A; Britton PD Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jun; 36(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 20452740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized detection of breast cancer with artificial intelligence and thermograms. Ng EY; Fok SC; Peh YC; Ng FC; Sim LS J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(4):152-7. PubMed ID: 12396330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital infrared thermal imaging (DITI) of breast lesions: sensitivity and specificity of detection of primary breast cancers. Kontos M; Wilson R; Fentiman I Clin Radiol; 2011 Jun; 66(6):536-9. PubMed ID: 21377664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advanced integrated technique in breast cancer thermography. Ng EY; Kee EC J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 17852648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast imaging and needle biopsy in women with clinically evident breast cancer: does combined imaging change overall diagnostic sensitivity? Ciatto S; Houssami N Breast; 2007 Aug; 16(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 17350262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Needle aspiration cytology of the breast: current perspective on the role in diagnosis and management]. Kocjan G Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Oct; 62(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 19205416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Infrared imaging does not predict the presence of malignancy in patients with suspicious radiologic breast abnormalities. Collett AE; Guilfoyle C; Gracely EJ; Frazier TG; Barrio AV Breast J; 2014; 20(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 24861444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective evaluation of positron emission tomography scanning, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and standard axillary dissection for axillary staging in patients with early stage breast cancer. Lovrics PJ; Chen V; Coates G; Cornacchi SD; Goldsmith CH; Law C; Levine MN; Sanders K; Tandan VR Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Sep; 11(9):846-53. PubMed ID: 15313737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complementary role of adjunctive breast magnetic resonance imaging and scintimammography in patients of all ages undergoing breast cancer surgery. Howarth D; Slater S; Lau P; Booker J; Clark D; Sillar R Australas Radiol; 2005 Aug; 49(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 16026435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of a noninvasive digital infrared thermal imaging system in the detection of breast cancer. Arora N; Martins D; Ruggerio D; Tousimis E; Swistel AJ; Osborne MP; Simmons RM Am J Surg; 2008 Oct; 196(4):523-6. PubMed ID: 18809055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sentinel lymph node as a new marker for therapeutic planning in breast cancer patients. Gipponi M; Bassetti C; Canavese G; Catturich A; Di Somma C; Vecchio C; Nicolò G; Schenone F; Tomei D; Cafiero F J Surg Oncol; 2004 Mar; 85(3):102-11. PubMed ID: 14991881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative review of thermography as a breast cancer screening technique. Kennedy DA; Lee T; Seely D Integr Cancer Ther; 2009 Mar; 8(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 19223370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Lehman CD; Blume JD; Weatherall P; Thickman D; Hylton N; Warner E; Pisano E; Schnitt SJ; Gatsonis C; Schnall M; DeAngelis GA; Stomper P; Rosen EL; O'Loughlin M; Harms S; Bluemke DA; Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A dynamic infrared imaging-based diagnostic process for breast cancer. Joro R; Lääperi AL; Dastidar P; Järvenpää R; Kuukasjärvi T; Toivonen T; Saaristo R; Soimakallio S Acta Radiol; 2009 Oct; 50(8):860-9. PubMed ID: 19636984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ductal lavage findings in women with known breast cancer undergoing mastectomy. Khan SA; Wiley EL; Rodriguez N; Baird C; Ramakrishnan R; Nayar R; Bryk M; Bethke KB; Staradub VL; Wolfman J; Rademaker A; Ljung BM; Morrow M J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(20):1510-7. PubMed ID: 15494601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New approaches to the imaging, diagnosis, and biopsy of breast lesions. Esserman LJ Cancer J; 2002; 8 Suppl 1():S1-14. PubMed ID: 12075695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is sentinel lymph node biopsy more accurate than axillary dissection for staging nodal involvement in breast cancer patients? Marrazzo A; Taormina P; Gebbiab V; David M; Riili I; Lo Gerfo D; Casà L; Noto A Chir Ital; 2007; 59(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 18019642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Continued axillary sampling is unnecessary and provides no further information to sentinel node biopsy in staging breast cancer. Gui GP; Joubert DJ; Reichert R; Ward A; Lakhani S; Osin P; Nerurkar A; A'Hern R; Benson K; Underwood SR Eur J Surg Oncol; 2005 Sep; 31(7):707-14. PubMed ID: 15993028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ICG fluorescence-guided sentinel node biopsy for axillary nodal staging in breast cancer. Hirche C; Murawa D; Mohr Z; Kneif S; Hünerbein M Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jun; 121(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 20140704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thermography--a feasible method for screening breast cancer? Kolarić D; Herceg Z; Nola IA; Ramljak V; Kulis T; Holjevac JK; Deutsch JA; Antonini S Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):583-8. PubMed ID: 23941007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]