BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20455108)

  • 1. The management of test results in primary care: does an electronic medical record make a difference?
    Elder NC; McEwen TR; Flach J; Gallimore J; Pallerla H
    Fam Med; 2010 May; 42(5):327-33. PubMed ID: 20455108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
    Silfen E
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the electronic medical record to improve asthma severity documentation and treatment among family medicine residents.
    Davis AM; Cannon M; Ables AZ; Bendyk H
    Fam Med; 2010 May; 42(5):334-7. PubMed ID: 20455109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring provider adherence to tobacco treatment guidelines: a comparison of electronic medical record review, patient survey, and provider survey.
    Conroy MB; Majchrzak NE; Silverman CB; Chang Y; Regan S; Schneider LI; Rigotti NA
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2005 Apr; 7 Suppl 1():S35-43. PubMed ID: 16036268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of an electronic medical record to improve documentation and treatment of obesity.
    Bordowitz R; Morland K; Reich D
    Fam Med; 2007 Apr; 39(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 17401772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An analysis of trends, perceptions, and use patterns of electronic medical records among US family practice residency programs.
    Lenhart JG; Honess K; Covington D; Johnson KE
    Fam Med; 2000 Feb; 32(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 10697769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Description of documentation in the management of chronic spinal pain.
    Manchikanti L; Singh V; Pampati V; Boswell MV; Benyamin RM; Hirsch JA;
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(4):E199-224. PubMed ID: 19668282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2006.
    Hing ES; Burt CW; Woodwell DA
    Adv Data; 2007 Oct; (393):1-7. PubMed ID: 18019786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Commentary: The RIME/EMR scheme: an educational approach to clinical documentation in electronic medical records.
    Stephens MB; Gimbel RW; Pangaro L
    Acad Med; 2011 Jan; 86(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 21191202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The feasibility of paper-based Tracking Codes and electronic medical record systems to monitor tobacco-use assessment and intervention in an Individual Practice Association (IPA) Model health maintenance organization (HMO).
    Bentz CJ; Davis N; Bayley B
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2002; 4 Suppl 1():S9-17. PubMed ID: 11945214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability in code selection using the 1995 and 1998 HCFA documentation guidelines for office services. Health Care Financing Administration.
    Zuber TJ; Rhody CE; Muday TA; Jackson EA; Rupke SJ; Francke L; Rathkamp WT
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Jul; 49(7):642-5. PubMed ID: 10923576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrated electronic decision support increases cardiovascular disease risk assessment four fold in routine primary care practice.
    Wells S; Furness S; Rafter N; Horn E; Whittaker R; Stewart A; Moodabe K; Roseman P; Selak V; Bramley D; Jackson R
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 15(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 18391644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Compliance of reviewing portal images on radiographic film vs an electronic medical record.
    Chen GG; Hammoud A; Komajda M; Konski A
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Jul; 9(7):495-7. PubMed ID: 22748791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Practice systems for chronic care: frequency and dependence on an electronic medical record.
    Solberg LI; Scholle SH; Asche SE; Shih SC; Pawlson LG; Thoele MJ; Murphy AL
    Am J Manag Care; 2005 Dec; 11(12):789-96. PubMed ID: 16336063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementing an electronic medical record at a residency site: physicians' perceived effects on quality of care, documentation, and productivity.
    Brotzman GL; Guse CE; Fay DL; Schellhase KG; Marbella AM
    WMJ; 2009 Apr; 108(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 19437936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diabetics can be identified in an electronic medical record using laboratory tests and prescriptions.
    Tu K; Manuel D; Lam K; Kavanagh D; Mitiku TF; Guo H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 20638237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electronic medical records: the family practice resident perspective.
    Aaronson JW; Murphy-Cullen CL; Chop WM; Frey RD
    Fam Med; 2001 Feb; 33(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 11271741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. E/M documentation pitfalls and audit advice.
    Dacey B
    J Med Pract Manage; 2006; 21(4):204-6. PubMed ID: 16562520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of electronic medical records by physicians and students in academic internal medicine settings.
    Mintz M; Narvarte HJ; O'Brien KE; Papp KK; Thomas M; Durning SJ
    Acad Med; 2009 Dec; 84(12):1698-704. PubMed ID: 19940575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selecting an electronic medical record system for small physician practices.
    duPont NC; Koeninger D; Guyer JD; Travers D
    N C Med J; 2009; 70(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 19999516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.