These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20455259)

  • 1. Real-time ligand binding pocket database search using local surface descriptors.
    Chikhi R; Sael L; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2010 Jul; 78(9):2007-28. PubMed ID: 20455259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PatchSurfers: Two methods for local molecular property-based binding ligand prediction.
    Shin WH; Bures MG; Kihara D
    Methods; 2016 Jan; 93():41-50. PubMed ID: 26427548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting local ligand-binding site similarity in nonhomologous proteins by surface patch comparison.
    Sael L; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2012 Apr; 80(4):1177-95. PubMed ID: 22275074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
    Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-organizing fuzzy graphs for structure-based comparison of protein pockets.
    Reisen F; Weisel M; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    J Proteome Res; 2010 Dec; 9(12):6498-510. PubMed ID: 20883038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toward prediction of functional protein pockets using blind docking and pocket search algorithms.
    Hetényi C; van der Spoel D
    Protein Sci; 2011 May; 20(5):880-93. PubMed ID: 21413095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular surface representation using 3D Zernike descriptors for protein shape comparison and docking.
    Kihara D; Sael L; Chikhi R; Esquivel-Rodriguez J
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2011 Sep; 12(6):520-30. PubMed ID: 21787306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binding ligand prediction for proteins using partial matching of local surface patches.
    Sael L; Kihara D
    Int J Mol Sci; 2010; 11(12):5009-26. PubMed ID: 21614188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Development and validation of programs for ligand-binding-pocket search].
    Oda A
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2011; 131(10):1429-35. PubMed ID: 21963969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of local geometry of protein surfaces with the visibility criterion.
    Li B; Turuvekere S; Agrawal M; La D; Ramani K; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(2):670-83. PubMed ID: 17975834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Constructing patch-based ligand-binding pocket database for predicting function of proteins.
    Sael L; Kihara D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. PubMed ID: 22536870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Augmented Pocketome: Detection and Analysis of Small-Molecule Binding Pockets in Proteins of Known 3D Structure.
    Bhagavat R; Sankar S; Srinivasan N; Chandra N
    Structure; 2018 Mar; 26(3):499-512.e2. PubMed ID: 29514079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ligand-binding site prediction using ligand-interacting and binding site-enriched protein triangles.
    Xie ZR; Hwang MJ
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 28(12):1579-85. PubMed ID: 22495747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protein-protein docking using region-based 3D Zernike descriptors.
    Venkatraman V; Yang YD; Sael L; Kihara D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Dec; 10():407. PubMed ID: 20003235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pocketome via comprehensive identification and classification of ligand binding envelopes.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2005 Jun; 4(6):752-61. PubMed ID: 15757999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The distribution of ligand-binding pockets around protein-protein interfaces suggests a general mechanism for pocket formation.
    Gao M; Skolnick J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Mar; 109(10):3784-9. PubMed ID: 22355140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design.
    Liang J; Edelsbrunner H; Woodward C
    Protein Sci; 1998 Sep; 7(9):1884-97. PubMed ID: 9761470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PLIC: protein-ligand interaction clusters.
    Anand P; Nagarajan D; Mukherjee S; Chandra N
    Database (Oxford); 2014; 2014(0):bau029. PubMed ID: 24763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting protein-ligand binding site using support vector machine with protein properties.
    Wong GY; Leung FH; Ling SH
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(6):1517-29. PubMed ID: 24407309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.