123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20455556)
1. Estimating the confidence of peptide identifications without decoy databases.
Renard BY; Timm W; Kirchner M; Steen JA; Hamprecht FA; Steen H
Anal Chem; 2010 Jun; 82(11):4314-8. PubMed ID: 20455556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Added value for tandem mass spectrometry shotgun proteomics data validation through isoelectric focusing of peptides.
Heller M; Ye M; Michel PE; Morier P; Stalder D; Jünger MA; Aebersold R; Reymond F; Rossier JS
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(6):2273-82. PubMed ID: 16335976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving peptide identification using an empirical peptide retention time database.
Sun W; Zhang L; Yang R; Shao C; Zhang Z; Gao Y
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2009 Jan; 23(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 19065623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of the resolution limitations of peptide identification algorithms.
Colaert N; Degroeve S; Helsens K; Martens L
J Proteome Res; 2011 Dec; 10(12):5555-61. PubMed ID: 21995378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MUDE: a new approach for optimizing sensitivity in the target-decoy search strategy for large-scale peptide/protein identification.
Cerqueira FR; Graber A; Schwikowski B; Baumgartner C
J Proteome Res; 2010 May; 9(5):2265-77. PubMed ID: 20199108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrated approach for manual evaluation of peptides identified by searching protein sequence databases with tandem mass spectra.
Chen Y; Kwon SW; Kim SC; Zhao Y
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(3):998-1005. PubMed ID: 15952748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Instance based algorithm for posterior probability calculation by target-decoy strategy to improve protein identifications.
Jiang X; Dong X; Ye M; Zou H
Anal Chem; 2008 Dec; 80(23):9326-35. PubMed ID: 19551949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Probability-based evaluation of peptide and protein identifications from tandem mass spectrometry and SEQUEST analysis: the human proteome.
Qian WJ; Liu T; Monroe ME; Strittmatter EF; Jacobs JM; Kangas LJ; Petritis K; Camp DG; Smith RD
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 15707357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial decoy spectral libraries for false discovery rate estimation in spectral library searching in proteomics.
Lam H; Deutsch EW; Aebersold R
J Proteome Res; 2010 Jan; 9(1):605-10. PubMed ID: 19916561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations.
Elias JE; Haas W; Faherty BK; Gygi SP
Nat Methods; 2005 Sep; 2(9):667-75. PubMed ID: 16118637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maximizing the sensitivity and reliability of peptide identification in large-scale proteomic experiments by harnessing multiple search engines.
Yu W; Taylor JA; Davis MT; Bonilla LE; Lee KA; Auger PL; Farnsworth CC; Welcher AA; Patterson SD
Proteomics; 2010 Mar; 10(6):1172-89. PubMed ID: 20101609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peptide identification quality control.
Vaudel M; Burkhart JM; Sickmann A; Martens L; Zahedi RP
Proteomics; 2011 May; 11(10):2105-14. PubMed ID: 21500347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proteomics-grade de novo sequencing approach.
Savitski MM; Nielsen ML; Kjeldsen F; Zubarev RA
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(6):2348-54. PubMed ID: 16335984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An easy-to-use Decoy Database Builder software tool, implementing different decoy strategies for false discovery rate calculation in automated MS/MS protein identifications.
Reidegeld KA; Eisenacher M; Kohl M; Chamrad D; Körting G; Blüggel M; Meyer HE; Stephan C
Proteomics; 2008 Mar; 8(6):1129-37. PubMed ID: 18338823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. De novo sequencing methods in proteomics.
Hughes C; Ma B; Lajoie GA
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 604():105-21. PubMed ID: 20013367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid validation of protein identifications with the borderline statistical confidence via de novo sequencing and MS BLAST searches.
Wielsch N; Thomas H; Surendranath V; Waridel P; Frank A; Pevzner P; Shevchenko A
J Proteome Res; 2006 Sep; 5(9):2448-56. PubMed ID: 16944958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An iterative strategy for precursor ion selection for LC-MS/MS based shotgun proteomics.
Zerck A; Nordhoff E; Resemann A; Mirgorodskaya E; Suckau D; Reinert K; Lehrach H; Gobom J
J Proteome Res; 2009 Jul; 8(7):3239-51. PubMed ID: 19402737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comprehensive and reliable phosphorylation site mapping of individual phosphoproteins by combination of multiple stage mass spectrometric analysis with a target-decoy database search.
Han G; Ye M; Jiang X; Chen R; Ren J; Xue Y; Wang F; Song C; Yao X; Zou H
Anal Chem; 2009 Jul; 81(14):5794-805. PubMed ID: 19522514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Elective affinities--bioinformatic analysis of proteomic mass spectrometry data.
Li X; Pizarro A; Grosser T
Arch Physiol Biochem; 2009 Dec; 115(5):311-9. PubMed ID: 19911947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving sensitivity in shotgun proteomics using a peptide-centric database with reduced complexity: protease cleavage and SCX elution rules from data mining of MS/MS spectra.
Yen CY; Russell S; Mendoza AM; Meyer-Arendt K; Sun S; Cios KJ; Ahn NG; Resing KA
Anal Chem; 2006 Feb; 78(4):1071-84. PubMed ID: 16478097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
