These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2045563)

  • 21. A performance programmed method for computing inbreeding coefficients from large data sets for use in mixed-model analyses.
    Golden BL; Brinks JS; Bourdon RM
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Sep; 69(9):3564-73. PubMed ID: 1938642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Milk, fat, protein, somatic cell score, and days open among Holstein, Brown Swiss, and their crosses.
    Dechow CD; Rogers GW; Cooper JB; Phelps MI; Mosholder AL
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jul; 90(7):3542-9. PubMed ID: 17582138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison between a sire model and an animal model for genetic evaluation of fertility traits in Danish Holstein population.
    Sun C; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Zhang Y; Lund MS; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Aug; 92(8):4063-71. PubMed ID: 19620690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Relationship between individual herd-heritability estimates and sire misidentification rate.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD; Zwald NR; Cowan CM; Meland OM
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Apr; 91(4):1640-7. PubMed ID: 18349256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Technical note: an R package for fitting generalized linear mixed models in animal breeding.
    Vazquez AI; Bates DM; Rosa GJ; Gianola D; Weigel KA
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):497-504. PubMed ID: 19820058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prediction of most recent evaluations of Holstein bulls from first available pedigree information.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Mar; 85(3):670-6. PubMed ID: 11949873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genetic diversity and joint-pedigree analysis of two importing Holstein populations.
    Hammami H; Croquet C; Stoll J; Rekik B; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jul; 90(7):3530-41. PubMed ID: 17582137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An indirect method of forming expressions for the inverses of genetic variance-covariance matrices for two traits.
    Slanger WD
    J Dairy Sci; 1977 Sep; 60(9):1440-7. PubMed ID: 915071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimation of genetic parameters using sampled data from populations undergoing selection.
    Jensen J; Mao IL
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Oct; 74(10):3544-51. PubMed ID: 1744281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of sire mating patterns on future genetic merit and inbreeding in a closed beef cattle population.
    Oyama K; Nojima M; Shojo M; Fukushima M; Anada K; Mukai F
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Apr; 124(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 17488357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of inbreeding and its relationship with functional longevity in Canadian dairy cattle.
    Sewalem A; Kistemaker GJ; Miglior F; Van Doormaal BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Jun; 89(6):2210-6. PubMed ID: 16702287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Predictability of bull merit from genetic evaluations of sires and maternal grandsires using an animal model.
    Rekik B; Berger PJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 May; 80(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 9178137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Potential genetic gains from producing bulls with only sires as parents.
    Van Raden PM; Freeman AE
    J Dairy Sci; 1985 Jun; 68(6):1425-31. PubMed ID: 3860522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prediction of longevity breeding values for US Holstein sires using survival analysis methodology.
    Caraviello DZ; Weigel KA; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Oct; 87(10):3518-25. PubMed ID: 15377631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of inbreeding in the dam on dystocia and stillbirths in US Holsteins.
    Adamec V; Cassell BG; Smith EP; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Jan; 89(1):307-14. PubMed ID: 16357294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prediction of dairy bull fertility from field data: use of multiple services and identification and utilization of factors affecting bull fertility.
    Kuhn MT; Hutchison JL
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jun; 91(6):2481-92. PubMed ID: 18487672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implementation of a sire-maternal grandsire model for evaluation of calving ease in the United States.
    Van Tassell CP; Wiggans GR; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Oct; 86(10):3366-73. PubMed ID: 14594257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using recursion to compute the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix.
    Misztal I; Legarra A; Aguilar I
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3943-52. PubMed ID: 24679933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimation of the dominance variance for postweaning gain in the U.S. Limousin population.
    Gengler N; Misztal I; Bertrand JK; Culbertson MS
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Oct; 76(10):2515-20. PubMed ID: 9814888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Unraveling additive from nonadditive effects using genomic relationship matrices.
    Muñoz PR; Resende MF; Gezan SA; Resende MD; de Los Campos G; Kirst M; Huber D; Peter GF
    Genetics; 2014 Dec; 198(4):1759-68. PubMed ID: 25324160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.