These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2045563)

  • 41. Estimation of nonadditive genetic variances for a total-merit model including maternal effects.
    Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Aug; 71(8):2006-11. PubMed ID: 8376222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Modeling pedigree accuracy and uncertain parentage in single-step genomic evaluations of simulated and US Holstein datasets.
    Bradford HL; Masuda Y; Cole JB; Misztal I; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2308-2318. PubMed ID: 30639024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of genetic variation in the international Brown Swiss population.
    Worede GM; Forabosco F; Zumbach B; Palucci V; Jorjani H
    Animal; 2013 Jul; 7(7):1060-6. PubMed ID: 23462433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Efficient computation of the genomic relationship matrix and other matrices used in single-step evaluation.
    Aguilar I; Misztal I; Legarra A; Tsuruta S
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Dec; 128(6):422-8. PubMed ID: 22059575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Extending pedigree analysis for uncertain parentage and diverse breeding systems.
    Lacy RC
    J Hered; 2012; 103(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 22275398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Pedigree-based estimation of covariance between dominance deviations and additive genetic effects in closed rabbit lines considering inbreeding and using a computationally simpler equivalent model.
    Fernández EN; Legarra A; Martínez R; Sánchez JP; Baselga M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):184-195. PubMed ID: 28508486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Inexpensive Computation of the Inverse of the Genomic Relationship Matrix in Populations with Small Effective Population Size.
    Misztal I
    Genetics; 2016 Feb; 202(2):401-9. PubMed ID: 26584903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effects of data structure on variance of prediction error and accuracy of genetic evaluation.
    Tosh JJ; Wilton JW
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Oct; 72(10):2568-77. PubMed ID: 7883613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Non-additive genetic effects for fertility traits in Canadian Holstein cattle.
    Palucci V; Schaeffer LR; Miglior F; Osborne V
    Genet Sel Evol; 2007; 39(2):181-93. PubMed ID: 17306200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A recursive algorithm for decomposition and creation of the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix.
    Faux P; Gengler N; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Oct; 95(10):6093-102. PubMed ID: 22884343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Application of supernodal sparse factorization and inversion to the estimation of (co)variance components by residual maximum likelihood.
    Masuda Y; Baba T; Suzuki M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Jun; 131(3):227-36. PubMed ID: 24906028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Restricted maximum likelihood procedures for the estimation of additive and nonadditive genetic variances and covariances in multibreed populations.
    Elzo MA
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Dec; 72(12):3055-65. PubMed ID: 7759353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reduced animal model with differential genetic grouping for direct and maternal effects.
    Cantet RJ; Schaeffer LR; Smith C
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1730-41. PubMed ID: 1634397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A simple algorithm to estimate genetic variance in an animal threshold model using Bayesian inference.
    Ødegård J; Meuwissen TH; Heringstad B; Madsen P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Jul; 42(1):29. PubMed ID: 20649962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of models for missing pedigree in single-step genomic prediction.
    Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Bermann M; Bradford HL; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Feb; 99(2):. PubMed ID: 33493284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Adapting best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for timely genetic evaluation: I. Progeny traits in a single contemporary group for each sex.
    Harris DL; Lofgren DL; Stewart TS; Schinckel AP
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Dec; 67(12):3209-22. PubMed ID: 2613570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Absorption of equations for non-parents for an animal model with maternal effects and genetic groups.
    Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Dec; 68(12):4014-25. PubMed ID: 2286544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. C. R. Henderson: contributions to predicting genetic merit.
    Schaeffer LR
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Nov; 74(11):4052-66. PubMed ID: 1757643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A multivariate analysis with direct additive and inbreeding depression load effects.
    Varona L; Altarriba J; Moreno C; Martínez-Castillero M; Casellas J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Dec; 51(1):78. PubMed ID: 31878872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Ancestral Relationships Using Metafounders: Finite Ancestral Populations and Across Population Relationships.
    Legarra A; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Aguilar I; Misztal I
    Genetics; 2015 Jun; 200(2):455-68. PubMed ID: 25873631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.