BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2045583)

  • 1. Evidence for the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Lonsbury-Martin BL; Cutler WM; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Apr; 89(4 Pt 1):1749-59. PubMed ID: 2045583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
    Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in the Compressive Nonlinearity of the Cochlea During Early Aging: Estimates From Distortion OAE Input/Output Functions.
    Ortmann AJ; Abdala C
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):603-14. PubMed ID: 27232070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The clinical use of oto-acoustic emissions of cochlear distortion products].
    Hauser R; Probst R; Harris FP
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Mar; 70(3):123-31. PubMed ID: 2036146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics: relationships in patients with and without endolymphatic hydrops.
    Fetterman BL
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):946-54. PubMed ID: 11404602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Distortion product of otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss].
    Schlögel H; Stephan K; Böheim K; Welzl-Müller K
    HNO; 1995 Jan; 43(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 7890546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing threshold estimation using concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady-state responses.
    Rosner T; Kandzia F; Oswald JA; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):840-51. PubMed ID: 21361442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of age and presbyacusis on DPOAE.
    Oeken J; Lenk A; Bootz F
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Mar; 120(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 10894416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-source interference as the major reason for auditory-threshold estimation error based on DPOAE input-output functions in normal-hearing subjects.
    Dalhoff E; Turcanu D; Vetešník A; Gummer AW
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():67-82. PubMed ID: 23268357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Level dependence of the nonlinear-distortion component of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Zelle D; Thiericke JP; Dalhoff E; Gummer AW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3475-90. PubMed ID: 26723305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.
    Hauser R; Probst R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 2002169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears.
    Boege P; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1810-8. PubMed ID: 12002865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of cochlear function in mice: distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Martin GK; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Curr Protoc Neurosci; 2006 Feb; Chapter 8():Unit8.21C. PubMed ID: 18428646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The influence of aging on otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing subjects].
    Lisowska G; Namysłowski G; Orecka B; Misiołek M; Scierski W; Czecior E
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2007; 61(5):796-800. PubMed ID: 18552022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An objective method of analyzing cochlear versus noncochlear patterns of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in patients with acoustic neuromas.
    Telischi F
    Laryngoscope; 2000 Apr; 110(4):553-62. PubMed ID: 10763999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of cochlear function in normal-hearing young adults exposed to MP3 player noise by analyzing transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
    Santaolalla Montoya F; Ibargüen AM; Vences AR; del Rey AS; Fernandez JM
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Oct; 37(5):718-24. PubMed ID: 19128682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.