These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20455951)

  • 1. Transcriptional analysis in microbial fuel cells: common pitfalls in global gene expression studies of microbial biofilms.
    Franks AE
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2010 Jun; 307(2):111-2. PubMed ID: 20455951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microtoming coupled to microarray analysis to evaluate the spatial metabolic status of Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms.
    Franks AE; Nevin KP; Glaven RH; Lovley DR
    ISME J; 2010 Apr; 4(4):509-19. PubMed ID: 20033069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenges in microbial fuel cell development and operation.
    Kim BH; Chang IS; Gadd GM
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 76(3):485-94. PubMed ID: 17593364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is resistance futile? Changing external resistance does not improve microbial fuel cell performance.
    Lyon DY; Buret F; Vogel TM; Monier JM
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2010 Apr; 78(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 19783225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From fundamentals to microbial power plants: electrochemically active biofilms.
    Bergel A; Feron D; Flemming HC
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2010 Apr; 78(1):1. PubMed ID: 19926537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Localized expression profiles of rpoS in Escherichia coli biofilms.
    Ito A; May T; Taniuchi A; Kawata K; Okabe S
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2009 Aug; 103(5):975-83. PubMed ID: 19288441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A time-course transcriptome analysis of Escherichia coli with direct electrochemistry behavior in microbial fuel cells.
    Qiao Y; Li CM; Lu Z; Ling H; Kang A; Chang MW
    Chem Commun (Camb); 2009 Nov; (41):6183-5. PubMed ID: 19826662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model based evaluation of the effect of pH and electrode geometry on microbial fuel cell performance.
    Picioreanu C; van Loosdrecht MC; Curtis TP; Scott K
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2010 Apr; 78(1):8-24. PubMed ID: 19523880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The promise and peril of transcriptional profiling in biofilm communities.
    An D; Parsek MR
    Curr Opin Microbiol; 2007 Jun; 10(3):292-6. PubMed ID: 17573234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Solar energy powered microbial fuel cell with a reversible bioelectrode.
    Strik DP; Hamelers HV; Buisman CJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jan; 44(1):532-7. PubMed ID: 19961218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Photosynthetic microbial fuel cells with positive light response.
    Zou Y; Pisciotta J; Billmyre RB; Baskakov IV
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2009 Dec; 104(5):939-46. PubMed ID: 19575441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of electro-active biofilms.
    Erable B; Duţeanu NM; Ghangrekar MM; Dumas C; Scott K
    Biofouling; 2010 Jan; 26(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 20390557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of electrochemical activity of a strain ISO2-3 phylogenetically related to Aeromonas sp. isolated from a glucose-fed microbial fuel cell.
    Chung K; Okabe S
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2009 Dec; 104(5):901-10. PubMed ID: 19575435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selection of a variant of Geobacter sulfurreducens with enhanced capacity for current production in microbial fuel cells.
    Yi H; Nevin KP; Kim BC; Franks AE; Klimes A; Tender LM; Lovley DR
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2009 Aug; 24(12):3498-503. PubMed ID: 19487117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuous power generation and microbial community structure of the anode biofilms in a three-stage microbial fuel cell system.
    Chung K; Okabe S
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Jul; 83(5):965-77. PubMed ID: 19404637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of anode bacterial communities and performance in microbial fuel cells with different electron donors.
    Jung S; Regan JM
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Nov; 77(2):393-402. PubMed ID: 17786426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of biocathodes in freshwater and brackish sediment microbial fuel cells.
    De Schamphelaire L; Boeckx P; Verstraete W
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Aug; 87(5):1675-87. PubMed ID: 20467736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A computational model for biofilm-based microbial fuel cells.
    Picioreanu C; Head IM; Katuri KP; van Loosdrecht MC; Scott K
    Water Res; 2007 Jul; 41(13):2921-40. PubMed ID: 17537478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electricity production and microbial biofilm characterization in cellulose-fed microbial fuel cells.
    Ren Z; Steinberg LM; Regan JM
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(3):617-22. PubMed ID: 18725730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The study of electrochemically active microbial biofilms on different carbon-based anode materials in microbial fuel cells.
    Liu Y; Harnisch F; Fricke K; Schröder U; Climent V; Feliu JM
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2010 May; 25(9):2167-71. PubMed ID: 20189793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.