224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20456025)
1. Effect of anchorage on the accuracy of fit in removable partial denture framework.
Gowri V; Patil NP; Nadiger RK; Guttal SS
J Prosthodont; 2010 Jul; 19(5):387-90. PubMed ID: 20456025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of storage time of removable partial denture wax pattern on the accuracy of fit of the cast framework.
Diwan R; Talic Y; Omar N; Sadiq W
J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Apr; 77(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 9104714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Over-refractory casting technique as an alternative to one-piece multi-unit fixed partial denture frameworks.
de Oliveira Correa G; Henriques GE; Mesquita MF; Sobrinho LC
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 16543023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of castability and surface roughness of commercially pure titanium and cobalt-chromium denture frameworks.
Jang KS; Youn SJ; Kim YS
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 11458267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surface roughness and internal porosity of partial removable dental prosthesis frameworks fabricated from conventional wax and light-polymerized patterns: a comparative study.
Swelem AA; Abdelnabi MH; Al-Dharrab AA; AbdelMaguid HF
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Apr; 111(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 24360012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The distortion of cast cobalt-chromium alloy partial denture frameworks fitted to a working cast.
Ali M; Nairn RI; Sherriff M; Waters NE
J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Oct; 78(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 9338876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fabrication of titanium removable dental prosthesis frameworks with a 2-step investment coating method.
Koike M; Hummel SK; Ball JD; Okabe T
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 22633596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An In Vitro Investigation of Accuracy and Fit of Conventional and CAD/CAM Removable Partial Denture Frameworks.
Soltanzadeh P; Suprono MS; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre C; Gregorius W
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):547-555. PubMed ID: 30407685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoral scanning of hard and soft tissues for partial removable dental prosthesis fabrication.
Kattadiyil MT; Mursic Z; AlRumaih H; Goodacre CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):444-8. PubMed ID: 24882595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of design modifications on the torsional and compressive rigidity of U-shaped palatal major connectors.
Green LK; Hondrum SO
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):400-7. PubMed ID: 12690354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of CAD/CAM technology to fabricate a removable partial denture framework.
Williams RJ; Bibb R; Eggbeer D; Collis J
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 16911885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of fit of cobalt-chromium removable partial denture frameworks on master casts.
Fenlon MR; Juszczyk AS; Hughes RJ; Walter JD; Sherriff M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Mar; 1(3):127-30. PubMed ID: 8148792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The strength of multiple major connector designs under simulated functional loading.
Pienkos TE; Morris WJ; Gronet PM; Cameron SM; Looney SW
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):299-304. PubMed ID: 17547949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of deformation by stereophotogrammetry of various kinds of major connectors in maxillary Kennedy Class I removable partial dentures.
Ozkan P; Aydin AK
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 11842909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retention strength of cobalt-chromium vs nickel-chromium titanium vs CP titanium in a cast framework association of removable partial overdenture.
Souza JE; Silva NR; Coelho PG; Zavanelli AC; Ferracioli RC; Zavanelli RA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 May; 12(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 22186813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of circumferential clasp retention force for titanium and cobalt-chromium removable partial dentures.
Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF; de Mattos Mda G; Bezzon OL
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 12426499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization--a laboratory study.
Keul C; Stawarczyk B; Erdelt KJ; Beuer F; Edelhoff D; Güth JF
Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):400-7. PubMed ID: 24522150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A survey of removable partial denture casts and major connector designs found in commercial laboratories, Athens, Greece.
Polychronakis N; Sotiriou M; Zissis A
J Prosthodont; 2013 Apr; 22(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 23387290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible.
Ortorp A; Jemt T; Bäck T; Jälevik T
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 12737254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
