BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20456579)

  • 21. Experimental studies on identification of the driver based on STR analysis.
    Ishiko A; Tsuji A; Yamaguchi H; Hayashiba Y; Inoue H; Ikeda N
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2008 May; 10(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 17981490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridge cases: A comparison of swabbing, tape lifting, vacuum filtration, and direct PCR.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; Gunn P; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110507. PubMed ID: 32977300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exploiting biological materials in forensic science.
    Gurvitz A; Lai LY; Neilan BA
    Australas Biotechnol; 1994; 4(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 7765343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. High-throughput DNA extraction of forensic adhesive tapes.
    Forsberg C; Jansson L; Ansell R; Hedman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():158-163. PubMed ID: 27448236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 10 years of 1:1 taping in Belgium - A selection of murder cases involving fibre examination.
    De Wael K; Lepot L; Lunstroot K; Gason F
    Sci Justice; 2016 Jan; 56(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 26746822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. RNA/DNA co-analysis on aged bloodstains from adhesive tapes used for gunshot residue collection from hands.
    Grabmüller M; Schyma C; Madea B; Eichhorst T; Courts C
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2017 Jun; 13(2):161-169. PubMed ID: 28444618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trace DNA Sampling Success from Evidence Items Commonly Encountered in Forensic Casework.
    Dziak R; Peneder A; Buetter A; Hageman C
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):835-841. PubMed ID: 28921603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. DNA profiles from clothing fibers using direct PCR.
    Blackie R; Taylor D; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2016 Sep; 12(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 27421265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recovery of trace DNA and its application to DNA profiling of shoe insoles.
    Bright JA; Petricevic SF
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Oct; 145(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 15374589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of tape type, taping method and tape storage temperature on the retrieval rate of fibres from various surfaces: An example of data generation and analysis to facilitate trace evidence recovery validation and optimisation.
    Jones ZV; Gwinnett C; Jackson ARW
    Sci Justice; 2019 May; 59(3):268-291. PubMed ID: 31054817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Systematic study for DNA recovery and profiling from common IED substrates: From laboratory to casework.
    Phetpeng S; Kitpipit T; Thanakiatkrai P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():53-60. PubMed ID: 25828367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A novel approach to obtaining reliable PCR results from luminol treated bloodstains.
    Della Manna A; Montpetit S
    J Forensic Sci; 2000 Jul; 45(4):886-90. PubMed ID: 10914590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The spectroscopic detection of drugs of abuse on textile fibres after recovery with adhesive lifters.
    West MJ; Went MJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):100-3. PubMed ID: 19464829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Trace evidence characteristics of DNA: A preliminary investigation of the persistence of DNA at crime scenes.
    Raymond JJ; van Oorschot RA; Gunn PR; Walsh SJ; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Dec; 4(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19948331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Guilty by his fibers: suspect confession versus textile fibers reconstructed simulation.
    Suzuki S; Higashikawa Y; Sugita R; Suzuki Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):e27-32. PubMed ID: 19411148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Threat mail and forensic science: DNA profiling from items of evidence after treatment with DFO.
    Zamir A; Oz C; Geller B
    J Forensic Sci; 2000 Mar; 45(2):445-6. PubMed ID: 10782971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of contact force on forensic trace collection efficiency when sampling textiles with adhesive tape.
    Damsteeg-van Berkel S; Beemster F; Dankelman J; Loeve AJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 May; 298():278-283. PubMed ID: 30925346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage.
    Baechler S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A sensitive method to extract DNA from biological traces present on ammunition for the purpose of genetic profiling.
    Dieltjes P; Mieremet R; Zuniga S; Kraaijenbrink T; Pijpe J; de Knijff P
    Int J Legal Med; 2011 Jul; 125(4):597-602. PubMed ID: 20419382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of the AmpliFLP D1S80 PCR Amplification Kit for forensic casework analysis according to TWGDAM guidelines.
    Cosso S; Reynolds R
    J Forensic Sci; 1995 May; 40(3):424-34. PubMed ID: 7782746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.