These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20456579)

  • 41. STR DNA typing: increased sensitivity and efficient sample consumption using reduced PCR reaction volumes.
    Leclair B; Sgueglia JB; Wojtowicz PC; Juston AC; Frégeau CJ; Fourney RM
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1001-13. PubMed ID: 14535663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Touch DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridges: Comparison of swabbing, tape lifting and soaking.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jan; 330():111101. PubMed ID: 34801815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Fast and simple DNA extraction from saliva and sperm cells obtained from the skin or isolated from swabs.
    von Wurmb-Schwark N; Mályusz V; Fremdt H; Koch C; Simeoni E; Schwark T
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2006 May; 8(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 16516526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Use of buccal epithelial cells for PCR amplification of large DNA fragments.
    Trevilatto PC; Line SR
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2000 Jun; 18(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 11324090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping of keratinised hair. Part 1. Review of current status and knowledge gaps.
    McNevin D; Wilson-Wilde L; Robertson J; Kyd J; Lennard C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Oct; 153(2-3):237-46. PubMed ID: 15985352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of stubbing and the double swab method for collecting offender epithelial material from a victim's skin.
    de Bruin KG; Verheij SM; Veenhoven M; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 21606013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
    Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Fingerprints and DNA: STR typing of DNA extracted from adhesive tape after processing for fingerprints.
    Zamir A; Springer E; Glattstein B
    J Forensic Sci; 2000 May; 45(3):687-8. PubMed ID: 10855979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Application of Touch DNA in Investigation Practice].
    Lu X; Xu Z; Niu QS; Tu Z
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 34(3):294-298. PubMed ID: 30051670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. DNA analysis from mixed biological materials.
    Barbaro A; Cormaci P; Barbaro A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Dec; 146 Suppl():S123-5. PubMed ID: 15639555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The application of isotope ratio mass spectrometry for discrimination and comparison of adhesive tapes.
    Horacek M; Min JS; Heo S; Park J; Papesch W
    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2008 Jun; 22(11):1763-6. PubMed ID: 18438979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Trace DNA analysis: do you know what your neighbour is doing? A multi-jurisdictional survey.
    Raymond JJ; van Oorschot RA; Walsh SJ; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jan; 2(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 19083785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Maximising trace soil evidence: an improved recovery method developed during investigation of a $26 million bank robbery.
    Ruffell A; Sandiford A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jun; 209(1-3):e1-7. PubMed ID: 21489731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Micromanipulation of single cells and fingerprints for forensic identification.
    Ostojic L; O'Connor C; Wurmbach E
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Mar; 51():102430. PubMed ID: 33260060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Evidence of DNA from epithelial cells of the hand of the suspect found on the tool of the crime].
    Förster R; Eberspächer B
    Arch Kriminol; 1999; 203(1-2):45-53. PubMed ID: 10198696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Mini-midi-mito: adapting the amplification and sequencing strategy of mtDNA to the degradation state of crime scene samples.
    Berger C; Parson W
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Jun; 3(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 19414161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Assessment of the transfer, persistence, prevalence and recovery of DNA traces from clothing: An inter-laboratory study on worn upper garments.
    Szkuta B; Ansell R; Boiso L; Connolly E; Kloosterman AD; Kokshoorn B; McKenna LG; Steensma K; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():56-68. PubMed ID: 31229887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Analysis of DNA evidence recovered from epithelial cells in penile swabs.
    Drobnic K
    Croat Med J; 2003 Jun; 44(3):350-4. PubMed ID: 12808732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A single approach to the recovery of DNA and firearm discharge residue evidence.
    Hall D; Fairley M
    Sci Justice; 2004; 44(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 14964817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. RNA/DNA co-analysis from bloodstains on aged polyvinyl-alcohol gloves prepared for securing evidence from the hands of victims of fatal gunshot injuries.
    Grabmüller M; Courts C; Madea B; Eichhorst T; Schyma C
    Int J Legal Med; 2018 Jan; 132(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 28956148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.