These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20457277)

  • 1. Minimization, by its nature, precludes allocation concealment, and invites selection bias.
    Berger VW
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Sep; 31(5):406. PubMed ID: 20457277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of minimization in clinical trials.
    Taves DR
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Mar; 31(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 20060500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should minimization replace randomization in all clinical trials?
    Tugwell P; Knottnerus JA; Idzerda L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 65(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22083018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rank-Minimization for balanced assignment of subjects in clinical trials.
    Stigsby B; Taves DR
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Mar; 31(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 20004741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Historical controls, data banks, and randomized trials in clinical research: a review.
    Fleming TR
    Cancer Treat Rep; 1982 May; 66(5):1101-5. PubMed ID: 7083214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials.
    Kunz R; Vist G; Oxman AD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):MR000012. PubMed ID: 17443633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rank-Minimization with a two-step analysis should replace randomization in clinical trials.
    Taves DR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 65(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 22118264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpretation of clinical trial results.
    Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5 Suppl):S114-20. PubMed ID: 19007606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategy and alternate randomized designs in cancer clinical trials.
    Zelen M
    Cancer Treat Rep; 1982 May; 66(5):1095-100. PubMed ID: 7083213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection bias, allocation concealment and randomization design in clinical trials.
    Zhao W
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Sep; 36(1):263-5. PubMed ID: 23871796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.
    Hofmeijer J; Anema PC; van der Tweel I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18177784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethically optimised designs.
    Clayton DG
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1982 Apr; 13(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 7066161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Collective equipoise, disappointment, and the therapeutic misconception: on the consequences of selection for clinical research.
    Byrne MM; Thompson P
    Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(5):467-79. PubMed ID: 16997925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rank minimization with a two-step analysis should not replace randomization in clinical trials.
    Morris T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):810-1. PubMed ID: 22564502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimize the use of minimization with unequal allocation.
    Proschan M; Brittain E; Kammerman L
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1135-41. PubMed ID: 21281276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.
    Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI
    Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Studywise minimization: a treatment allocation method that improves balance among treatment groups and makes allocation unpredictable.
    Perry M; Faes M; Reelick MF; Olde Rikkert MG; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 63(10):1118-22. PubMed ID: 20304606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials.
    Kunz R; Oxman AD
    BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7167):1185-90. PubMed ID: 9794851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomization. Part 3: allocation concealment and randomization implementation.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jan; 141(1):126-8. PubMed ID: 22196195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Allocation concealment in randomised controlled trials: are we getting better?
    Clark L; Fairhurst C; Torgerson DJ
    BMJ; 2016 Nov; 355():i5663. PubMed ID: 27856428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.