These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Analysis of wear in retrieved mobile and fixed bearing knee inserts. Engh GA; Zimmerman RL; Parks NL; Engh CA J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):28-32. PubMed ID: 19427754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of polyethylene tibial insert damage from in vivo function and in vitro wear simulation. Harman MK; DesJardins J; Benson L; Banks SA; LaBerge M; Hodge WA J Orthop Res; 2009 Apr; 27(4):540-8. PubMed ID: 18932244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wear analysis of unicondylar mobile bearing and fixed bearing knee systems: a knee simulator study. Kretzer JP; Jakubowitz E; Reinders J; Lietz E; Moradi B; Hofmann K; Sonntag R Acta Biomater; 2011 Feb; 7(2):710-5. PubMed ID: 20883831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term results of low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacements. Huang CH; Ma HM; Lee YM; Ho FY Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Nov; (416):265-70. PubMed ID: 14646769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of femoral to tibial varus mismatch on the contact area of unicondylar knee prostheses. Diezi C; Wirth S; Meyer DC; Koch PP Knee; 2010 Oct; 17(5):350-5. PubMed ID: 19914073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survival of medial unicondylar arthroplasties placed by one surgeon 1984-1998. Eickmann TH; Collier MB; Sukezaki F; McAuley JP; Engh GA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Nov; 452():143-9. PubMed ID: 16924172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty. Collier MB; Engh CA; McAuley JP; Engh GA J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jun; 89(6):1306-14. PubMed ID: 17545435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early catastrophic tibial component wear after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Palmer SH; Morrison PJ; Ross AC Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 May; (350):143-8. PubMed ID: 9602813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polyethylene insert damage in unicondylar knee replacement: a comparison of in vivo function and in vitro simulation. Harman M; Affatato S; Spinelli M; Zavalloni M; Stea S; Toni A Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(7):823-30. PubMed ID: 20839650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polyethylene wear in a non-congruous unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrieval analysis. Ashraf T; Newman JH; Desai VV; Beard D; Nevelos JE Knee; 2004 Jun; 11(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 15194092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wear of contemporary total knee replacements--a knee simulator study of six current designs. Utzschneider S; Harrasser N; Schroeder C; Mazoochian F; Jansson V Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):583-8. PubMed ID: 19450910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unicondylar knee replacement with a new tensioner device: clinical results of a multicentre study on 168 cases. Campbell D; Schuster AJ; Pfluger D; Hoffmann F Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Jun; 130(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 20306198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surface Damage Is Not Reduced With Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts at Short-term. Liu T; Esposito C; Elpers M; Wright T Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 26084848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component. Kurtz SM; Peloza J; Siskey R; Villarraga ML Spine J; 2005; 5(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 15863092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]