181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20457526)
1. Biomechanical analysis of ramp ambulation of transtibial amputees with an adaptive ankle foot system.
Fradet L; Alimusaj M; Braatz F; Wolf SI
Gait Posture; 2010 Jun; 32(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 20457526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Kinematics and kinetics with an adaptive ankle foot system during stair ambulation of transtibial amputees.
Alimusaj M; Fradet L; Braatz F; Gerner HJ; Wolf SI
Gait Posture; 2009 Oct; 30(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 19616436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pressure characteristics at the stump/socket interface in transtibial amputees using an adaptive prosthetic foot.
Wolf SI; Alimusaj M; Fradet L; Siegel J; Braatz F
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Dec; 24(10):860-5. PubMed ID: 19744755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees.
Agrawal V; Gailey RS; Gaunaurd IA; O'Toole C; Finnieston A; Tolchin R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Oct; 39(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 24925671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical analysis of stair ambulation in lower limb amputees.
Schmalz T; Blumentritt S; Marx B
Gait Posture; 2007 Feb; 25(2):267-78. PubMed ID: 16725325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanics of ramp descent in unilateral trans-tibial amputees: Comparison of a microprocessor controlled foot with conventional ankle-foot mechanisms.
Struchkov V; Buckley JG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():164-70. PubMed ID: 26689894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lower limb amputee gait characteristics on a specifically designed test ramp: Preliminary results of a biomechanical comparison of two prosthetic foot concepts.
Schmalz T; Altenburg B; Ernst M; Bellmann M; Rosenbaum D
Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():161-167. PubMed ID: 30497035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stair ascent kinematics and kinetics with a powered lower leg system following transtibial amputation.
Aldridge JM; Sturdy JT; Wilken JM
Gait Posture; 2012 Jun; 36(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 22571821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefits of a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic foot for ascending and descending slopes.
Ernst M; Altenburg B; Schmalz T; Kannenberg A; Bellmann M
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jan; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 35090505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimum toe clearance and tripping probability in people with unilateral transtibial amputation walking on ramps with different prosthetic designs.
Riveras M; Ravera E; Ewins D; Shaheen AF; Catalfamo-Formento P
Gait Posture; 2020 Sep; 81():41-48. PubMed ID: 32663775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subject-specific responses to an adaptive ankle prosthesis during incline walking.
Lamers EP; Eveld ME; Zelik KE
J Biomech; 2019 Oct; 95():109273. PubMed ID: 31431348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preliminary investigation of residual limb plantarflexion and dorsiflexion muscle activity during treadmill walking for trans-tibial amputees.
Silver-Thorn B; Current T; Kuhse B
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Dec; 36(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 22581661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in high-functioning transfemoral amputees.
Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J; Pros D
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 88(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 17532907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Elderly unilateral transtibial amputee gait on an inclined walkway: a biomechanical analysis.
Vickers DR; Palk C; McIntosh AS; Beatty KT
Gait Posture; 2008 Apr; 27(3):518-29. PubMed ID: 17707643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of foot placement strategies of transtibial amputees and able-bodied subjects during stair ambulation.
Ramstrand N; Nilsson KA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Dec; 33(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 19961296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputations.
Powers CM; Torburn L; Perry J; Ayyappa E
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Jul; 75(7):825-9. PubMed ID: 8024435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Symmetry in external work (SEW): a novel method of quantifying gait differences between prosthetic feet.
Agrawal V; Gailey R; O'Toole C; Gaunaurd I; Dowell T
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Jun; 33(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 19367518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Kinematics in the terminal swing phase of unilateral transfemoral amputees: microprocessor-controlled versus swing-phase control prosthetic knees.
Mâaref K; Martinet N; Grumillier C; Ghannouchi S; André JM; Paysant J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jun; 91(6):919-25. PubMed ID: 20510984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Control of lateral balance in walking. Experimental findings in normal subjects and above-knee amputees.
Hof AL; van Bockel RM; Schoppen T; Postema K
Gait Posture; 2007 Feb; 25(2):250-8. PubMed ID: 16740390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gait termination on a declined surface in trans-femoral amputees: Impact of using microprocessor-controlled limb system.
Abdulhasan ZM; Scally AJ; Buckley JG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Aug; 57():35-41. PubMed ID: 29908391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
