These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20458125)

  • 61. Female Juvenile Sexual Offenders: Understanding Who They Are and Possible Steps That May Prevent Some Girls From Offending.
    Oliver BE; Holmes L
    J Child Sex Abus; 2015; 24(6):698-715. PubMed ID: 26340075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A criminal careers typology of child sexual abusers.
    Wortley R; Smallbone S
    Sex Abuse; 2014 Dec; 26(6):569-85. PubMed ID: 24088813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Accuracy of sexually violent person assessments of juveniles adjudicated for sexual offenses.
    Caldwell MF
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Oct; 25(5):516-26. PubMed ID: 23508828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: a meta-analysis.
    Bonta J; Law M; Hanson K
    Psychol Bull; 1998 Mar; 123(2):123-42. PubMed ID: 9522681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Risk factors for overall recidivism and severity of recidivism in serious juvenile offenders.
    Mulder E; Brand E; Bullens R; van Marle H
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2011 Feb; 55(1):118-35. PubMed ID: 20181776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. An exploration of crossover sexual offending.
    Kleban H; Chesin MS; Jeglic EL; Mercado CC
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Oct; 25(5):427-43. PubMed ID: 23144168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Does childhood victimization predict specific adolescent offending? An analysis of generality versus specificity in the victim-offender overlap.
    Miley LN; Fox B; Muniz CN; Perkins R; DeLisi M
    Child Abuse Negl; 2020 Mar; 101():104328. PubMed ID: 31869698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of High-Intensity Inpatient Sex Offender Treatment in the Netherlands.
    Smid WJ; Kamphuis JH; Wever EC; Van Beek DJ
    Sex Abuse; 2016 Aug; 28(5):469-85. PubMed ID: 24867416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Psychiatric and Forensic Differences Between Men Charged with Sex Offences and Men Charged with Other Offences.
    Arbanas G; Marinović P; Buzina N
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):2042-2049. PubMed ID: 33180341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Criminal recidivism in offenders with and without intellectual disability sentenced to forensic psychiatric care in Sweden-A 17-year follow-up study.
    Edberg H; Chen Q; Andiné P; Larsson H; Hirvikoski T
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():1011984. PubMed ID: 36213925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Do Developmental and Life-Course Theory Risk Factors Equally Predict Age of Onset Among Juvenile Sexual and Nonsexual Offenders?
    Rosa M; Fox B; Jennings WG
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Feb; 32(1):55-78. PubMed ID: 30191769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Denial predicts recidivism for some sexual offenders.
    Nunes KL; Hanson RK; Firestone P; Moulden HM; Greenberg DM; Bradford JM
    Sex Abuse; 2007 Jun; 19(2):91-105. PubMed ID: 17534714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A classification of risk factors in serious juvenile offenders and the relation between patterns of risk factors and recidivism.
    Mulder E; Brand E; Bullens R; Van Marle H
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2010 Feb; 20(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 20104471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Trait empathy and criminal versatility in sexual offenders.
    Smallbone SW; Wheaton J; Hourigan D
    Sex Abuse; 2003 Jan; 15(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 12616928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A comparison of physical and sexual abuse: histories of sexual and non-sexual offenders with intellectual disability.
    Lindsay WR; Law J; Quinn K; Smart N; Smith AH
    Child Abuse Negl; 2001 Jul; 25(7):989-95. PubMed ID: 11523873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Five-year accuracy of assessments of high risk for sexual recidivism of adolescents.
    Hagan MP; Anderson DL; Caldwell MS; Kemper TS
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Feb; 54(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 18957553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The predictive validity of common risk assessment tools in men with intellectual disabilities and problematic sexual behaviors.
    Fedoroff JP; Richards D; Ranger R; Curry S
    Res Dev Disabil; 2016 Oct; 57():29-38. PubMed ID: 27372881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Child maltreatment victimization by type in relation to criminal recidivism in juvenile offenders.
    van der Put CE; de Ruiter C
    BMC Psychiatry; 2016 Feb; 16():24. PubMed ID: 26850451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [Assessment of a new law for sex offenders implemented in France in 1998].
    Tesson J; Cordier B; Thibaut F
    Encephale; 2012 Apr; 38(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 22516271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Adolescent and young adult male sex offenders: understanding the role of recidivism.
    Riser DK; Pegram SE; Farley JP
    J Child Sex Abus; 2013; 22(1):9-31. PubMed ID: 23350537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.