342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20458245)
1. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction.
Rogers AR; Burke SR; Kopun JG; Tan H; Neely ST; Gorga MP
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 20458245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements at and around 4 kHz.
Reuven ML; Neely ST; Kopun JG; Rasetshwane DM; Allen JB; Tan H; Gorga MP
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):779-88. PubMed ID: 24165303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: I. test performance.
Burke SR; Rogers AR; Neely ST; Kopun JG; Tan H; Gorga MP
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):533-45. PubMed ID: 20458246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.
Maxim T; Shera CA; Charaziak KK; Abdala C
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1345-1358. PubMed ID: 30882535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability.
Scheperle RA; Neely ST; Kopun JG; Gorga MP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):288-300. PubMed ID: 18646977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions.
Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA; Hoover BM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3275-84. PubMed ID: 12822800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical test performance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions using new stimulus conditions.
Johnson TA; Neely ST; Kopun JG; Dierking DM; Tan H; Gorga MP
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 19701088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-Frequency Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Repeatability in a Patient Population.
Dreisbach L; Zettner E; Chang Liu M; Meuel Fernhoff C; MacPhee I; Boothroyd A
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 28678077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-source interference as the major reason for auditory-threshold estimation error based on DPOAE input-output functions in normal-hearing subjects.
Dalhoff E; Turcanu D; Vetešník A; Gummer AW
Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():67-82. PubMed ID: 23268357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distribution of standing-wave errors in real-ear sound-level measurements.
Richmond SA; Kopun JG; Neely ST; Tan H; Gorga MP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3134-40. PubMed ID: 21568416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: its dependence on age and hearing threshold and clinical implications.
Wagner W; Plinkert PK; Vonthein R; Plontke SK
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 265(10):1165-72. PubMed ID: 18301908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Test-retest reliability of distortion-product thresholds compared to behavioral auditory thresholds.
Bader K; Dierkes L; Braun LH; Gummer AW; Dalhoff E; Zelle D
Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108232. PubMed ID: 33984603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
Hoth S
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears.
Boege P; Janssen T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1810-8. PubMed ID: 12002865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
