These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20459746)

  • 1. Literature search on risk factors for sarcoma: PubMed and Google Scholar may be complementary sources.
    Mastrangelo G; Fadda E; Rossi CR; Zamprogno E; Buja A; Cegolon L
    BMC Res Notes; 2010 May; 3():131. PubMed ID: 20459746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Google Scholar versus PubMed in locating primary literature to answer drug-related questions.
    Freeman MK; Lauderdale SA; Kendrach MG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2009 Mar; 43(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 19261965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrieving clinical evidence: a comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for quick clinical searches.
    Shariff SZ; Bejaimal SA; Sontrop JM; Iansavichus AV; Haynes RB; Weir MA; Garg AX
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e164. PubMed ID: 23948488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical literature searches: a comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar.
    Nourbakhsh E; Nugent R; Wang H; Cevik C; Nugent K
    Health Info Libr J; 2012 Sep; 29(3):214-22. PubMed ID: 22925384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews.
    Giustini D; Boulos MN
    Online J Public Health Inform; 2013; 5(2):214. PubMed ID: 23923099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews.
    Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM; Anderson P
    Syst Rev; 2013 Dec; 2():115. PubMed ID: 24360284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough.
    Boeker M; Vach W; Motschall E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Oct; 13():131. PubMed ID: 24160679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar literature searches.
    Anders ME; Evans DP
    Respir Care; 2010 May; 55(5):578-83. PubMed ID: 20420728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.
    Falagas ME; Pitsouni EI; Malietzis GA; Pappas G
    FASEB J; 2008 Feb; 22(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 17884971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews.
    Hanneke R; Young SK
    Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 6(1):156. PubMed ID: 28789703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Google Versus PubMed: Comparison of Google and PubMed's Search Tools for Answering Clinical Questions in the Emergency Department.
    Morshed T; Hayden S
    Ann Emerg Med; 2020 Mar; 75(3):408-415. PubMed ID: 31623934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.
    Kulkarni AV; Aziz B; Shams I; Busse JW
    JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(10):1092-6. PubMed ID: 19738094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developing search strategies for clinical practice guidelines in SUMSearch and Google Scholar and assessing their retrieval performance.
    Haase A; Follmann M; Skipka G; Kirchner H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jun; 7():28. PubMed ID: 17603909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching.
    Haddaway NR; Collins AM; Coughlin D; Kirk S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138237. PubMed ID: 26379270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study.
    Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM
    Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 5():39. PubMed ID: 26932789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variation in number of hits for complex searches in Google Scholar.
    Bramer WM
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Apr; 104(2):143-5. PubMed ID: 27076802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Croatian Medical Journal citation score in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
    Sember M; Utrobicić A; Petrak J
    Croat Med J; 2010 Apr; 51(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 20401951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Commentary to Gusenbauer and Haddaway 2020: Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar and PubMed.
    Klopfenstein DV; Dampier W
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):126-135. PubMed ID: 33031632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the coverage of Google Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews.
    Gehanno JF; Rollin L; Darmoni S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2013 Jan; 13():7. PubMed ID: 23302542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.