82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20461033)
1. A biomechanical study of top screw pullout in anterior scoliosis correction constructs.
Mayo AE; Labrom RD; Askin GN; Adam CJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):E587-95. PubMed ID: 20461033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New rod-plate anterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis: biomechanical evaluation compared with dual-rod and single-rod with structural interbody support.
Zhang H; Johnston CE; Pierce WA; Ashman RB; Bronson DG; Haideri NF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(25):E934-40. PubMed ID: 17139209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of different anchors (foundations) for the pediatric dual growing rod technique.
Mahar AT; Bagheri R; Oka R; Kostial P; Akbarnia BA
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):933-9. PubMed ID: 18082463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Novel dual-rod screw for thoracoscopic anterior instrumentation: biomechanical evaluation compared with single-rod and double-screw/double-rod anterior constructs.
Zhang H; Sucato DJ; Pierce WA; Ross D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(5):E183-8. PubMed ID: 19247158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of end screw orientation on the stability of anterior instrumentation in cyclic lateral bending.
Rodríguez-Olaverri JC; Hasharoni A; DeWal H; Nuzzo RM; Kummer FJ; Errico TJ
Spine J; 2005; 5(5):554-7. PubMed ID: 16153585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of constrained dual-screw anchorage on holding strength and the resistance to cyclic loading in anterior spinal deformity surgery: a comparative biomechanical study.
Koller H; Fierlbeck J; Auffarth A; Niederberger A; Stephan D; Hitzl W; Augat P; Zenner J; Blocher M; Blocher M; Resch H; Mayer M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):E390-8. PubMed ID: 24384666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preventing distal pullout of posterior spine instrumentation in thoracic hyperkyphosis: a biomechanical analysis.
Sun E; Alkalay R; Vader D; Snyder BD
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jun; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19494747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine.
Liljenqvist U; Hackenberg L; Link T; Halm H
Acta Orthop Belg; 2001 Apr; 67(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 11383294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pullout resistance of thoracic extrapedicular screws used as a salvage procedure.
Yüksel KZ; Adams MS; Chamberlain RH; Potocnjak M; Park SC; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2007; 7(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 17482111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anterior fixation in the osteoporotic spine: cut-out and pullout characteristics of implants.
Ferguson SJ; Winkler F; Nolte LP
Eur Spine J; 2002 Dec; 11(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 12522709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of screw positioning in a new anterior spine fixator on implant loosening in osteoporotic vertebrae.
Reinhold M; Schwieger K; Goldhahn J; Linke B; Knop C; Blauth M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16481950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pullout strength of anterior spinal instrumentation: a product comparison of seven screws in calf vertebral bodies.
Seller K; Wahl D; Wild A; Krauspe R; Schneider E; Linke B
Eur Spine J; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1047-54. PubMed ID: 17273838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparison of the pullout strength of 3 anterior double-screw fixation techniques with different screw angulations.
Fuerderer S; Vonhoegen J; Coenen O; Michael J; Koebke J; Eysel P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):367-71. PubMed ID: 21250813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The awl-staple versus guidewire method for placing vertebral screws in thoracoscopic anterior spinal fusion and instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Agrawal S; Sucato DJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):413-7. PubMed ID: 18679096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of the screw-bone interface: optimization of 1 and 2 screw constructs by varying screw diameter.
Mohamad F; Oka R; Mahar A; Wedemeyer M; Newton P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(16):E535-9. PubMed ID: 16845339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stability of anterior vertebral body screws after kyphoplasty augmentation. An experimental study to compare anterior vertebral body screw fixation in soft and cured kyphoplasty cement.
Linhardt O; Lüring C; Matussek J; Hamberger C; Herold T; Plitz W; Grifka J
Int Orthop; 2006 Oct; 30(5):366-70. PubMed ID: 16586135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanics of cantilever "plow" during anterior thoracic scoliosis correction.
Mahar AT; Brown DS; Oka RS; Newton PO
Spine J; 2006; 6(5):572-6. PubMed ID: 16934730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
