These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20461455)

  • 1. Diagnostic imaging--evaluating image quality using visual grading characteristic (VGC) analysis.
    Ludewig E; Richter A; Frame M
    Vet Res Commun; 2010 Jun; 34(5):473-9. PubMed ID: 20461455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation.
    Båth M; Månsson LG
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Mar; 80(951):169-76. PubMed ID: 16854962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. VGC ANALYZER: A SOFTWARE FOR STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FULLY CROSSED MULTIPLE-READER MULTIPLE-CASE VISUAL GRADING CHARACTERISTICS STUDIES.
    Båth M; Hansson J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):46-53. PubMed ID: 26769908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographers' perspectives' on Visual Grading Analysis as a scientific method to evaluate image quality.
    Precht H; Hansson J; Outzen C; Hogg P; Tingberg A
    Radiography (Lond); 2019 Oct; 25 Suppl 1():S14-S18. PubMed ID: 31481182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual grading characteristics and ordinal regression analysis during optimisation of CT head examinations.
    Zarb F; McEntee MF; Rainford L
    Insights Imaging; 2015 Jun; 6(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 25510470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CLINICAL AUDIT OF IMAGE QUALITY IN RADIOLOGY USING VISUAL GRADING CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS.
    Tesselaar E; Dahlström N; Sandborg M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):340-6. PubMed ID: 26410763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis of diagnostic image quality for high resolution 3 Tesla MRI volumetry of the olfactory bulb.
    Burmeister HP; Baltzer PA; Möslein C; Bitter T; Gudziol H; Dietzel M; Guntinas-Lichius O; Kaiser WA
    Acad Radiol; 2011 May; 18(5):634-9. PubMed ID: 21371913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. THORACIC SPINE IMAGING: A COMPARISON BETWEEN RADIOGRAPHY AND TOMOSYNTHESIS USING VISUAL GRADING CHARACTERISTICS.
    Ceder E; Danielson B; Kovàč P; Fogel H; Svalkvist A; Vikgren J; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):204-10. PubMed ID: 26868012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method to analyse observer disagreement in visual grading studies: example of assessed image quality in paediatric cerebral multidetector CT images.
    Ledenius K; Svensson E; Stålhammar F; Wiklund LM; Thilander-Klang A
    Br J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 83(991):604-11. PubMed ID: 20335429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does software optimization influence the radiologists' perception in low dose paediatric pelvic examinations?
    Precht H; Waaler D; Outzen CB; Brock Thorsen JB; Steen T; Hellfritzsch MB; Aagesen H; Holst AK; Le P; Lindequist S; Rasmussen L; Tingberg A
    Radiography (Lond); 2019 May; 25(2):143-147. PubMed ID: 30955687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image quality and radiation dose reduction in chest CT in pulmonary infection.
    Cristofaro M; Busi Rizzi E; Piselli P; Pianura E; Petrone A; Fusco N; Di Stefano F; Schinina' V
    Radiol Med; 2020 May; 125(5):451-460. PubMed ID: 32048157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EVALUATION OF VGC ANALYZER BY COMPARISON WITH GOLD STANDARD ROC SOFTWARE AND ANALYSIS OF SIMULATED VISUAL GRADING DATA.
    Hansson J; Månsson LG; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Oct; 195(3-4):378-390. PubMed ID: 33940628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter-observer variation in masked and unmasked images for quality evaluation of clinical radiographs.
    Tingberg A; Eriksson F; Medin J; Besjakov J; Båth M; Håkansson M; Sandborg M; Almén A; Lanhede B; Alm-Carlsson G; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):62-8. PubMed ID: 15933082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurements in radiology: the need for high reproducibility.
    Di Leo G
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 25552389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual grading of 2D and 3D functional MRI compared with image-based descriptive measures.
    Ragnehed M; Leinhard OD; Pihlsgård J; Wirell S; Sökjer H; Fägerstam P; Jiang B; Smedby O; Engström M; Lundberg P
    Eur Radiol; 2010 Mar; 20(3):714-24. PubMed ID: 19727748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of a novel edge enhancement software on image quality of DR hand images of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Outzen CB; Maron D; Nissen J; Munk J; Grau LM; Juhl D; Precht H
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Aug; 27(3):877-882. PubMed ID: 33676836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality.
    Smet MH; Breysem L; Mussen E; Bosmans H; Marshall NW; Cockmartin L
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2951-2959. PubMed ID: 29460076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. VIEWDEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies.
    Håkansson M; Svensson S; Zachrisson S; Svalkvist A; Båth M; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):42-51. PubMed ID: 20200105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual perception studies and observer models in medical imaging.
    Burgess AE
    Semin Nucl Med; 2011 Nov; 41(6):419-36. PubMed ID: 21978445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual grading regression: analysing data from visual grading experiments with regression models.
    Smedby O; Fredrikson M
    Br J Radiol; 2010 Sep; 83(993):767-75. PubMed ID: 20223912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.