These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20461565)

  • 1. Electronic medical record customization and the impact upon chart completion rates.
    Bennett KJ; Steen C
    Fam Med; 2010 May; 42(5):338-42. PubMed ID: 20461565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of the electronic health record on an academic pediatric primary care center.
    Samaan ZM; Klein MD; Mansour ME; DeWitt TG
    J Ambul Care Manage; 2009; 32(3):180-7. PubMed ID: 19542807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the electronic medical record to improve asthma severity documentation and treatment among family medicine residents.
    Davis AM; Cannon M; Ables AZ; Bendyk H
    Fam Med; 2010 May; 42(5):334-7. PubMed ID: 20455109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
    Silfen E
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential pitfalls with electronic medical records.
    Fitzgerald CL; Talug C; Zaslau S
    W V Med J; 2007; 103(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 17557536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementing an electronic medical record at a residency site: physicians' perceived effects on quality of care, documentation, and productivity.
    Brotzman GL; Guse CE; Fay DL; Schellhase KG; Marbella AM
    WMJ; 2009 Apr; 108(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 19437936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of an electronic medical record on quality of care in a primary care office.
    Gill JM; Ewen E; Nsereko M
    Del Med J; 2001 May; 73(5):187-94. PubMed ID: 11712258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The benefits and challenges of an electronic medical record: much more than a "word-processed" patient chart.
    Sujansky WV
    West J Med; 1998 Sep; 169(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 9771161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Partnering with clinical providers to enhance the efficiency of an EMR.
    Puffer MJ; Ferguson JA; Wright BC; Osborn J; Anshus AL; Cahill BP; Kamath J; Ryan MJ
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2007; 21(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 17299922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electronic medical records as tools for quality improvement in ambulatory practice: theory and a case study.
    Ornstein SM; Jenkins RG; MacFarlane L; Glaser A; Snyder K; Gundrum T
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1998 Nov; 19(2):35-43. PubMed ID: 10338712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors influencing the quality of medical documentation when a paper-based medical records system is replaced with an electronic medical records system: an Iranian case study.
    Pourasghar F; Malekafzali H; Koch S; Fors U
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 18828939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using an electronic medical record to improve communication within a prenatal care network.
    Bernstein PS; Farinelli C; Merkatz IR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):607-12. PubMed ID: 15738032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increasing compliance with mammography recommendations: health assessment forms.
    Yarnall KS; Michener JL; Broadhead WE; Tse CK
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Jan; 36(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 8419505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The management of test results in primary care: does an electronic medical record make a difference?
    Elder NC; McEwen TR; Flach J; Gallimore J; Pallerla H
    Fam Med; 2010 May; 42(5):327-33. PubMed ID: 20455108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency of automation and electronic health records in optometric practice.
    McVeigh FL; Tarbett AK; Betts AM; Boal TR
    Optometry; 2008 Jan; 79(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 18156095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring provider adherence to tobacco treatment guidelines: a comparison of electronic medical record review, patient survey, and provider survey.
    Conroy MB; Majchrzak NE; Silverman CB; Chang Y; Regan S; Schneider LI; Rigotti NA
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2005 Apr; 7 Suppl 1():S35-43. PubMed ID: 16036268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality improvement using electronic medical records: a case study of a high-performing practice.
    Litvin CB; Ornstein SM; Anthony WE; Tanner D
    Top Health Inf Manage; 2001 Nov; 22(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 11761793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electronic medical records for the orthopaedic practice.
    Alexander I
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Apr; 457():114-9. PubMed ID: 17415063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the impact of an electronic medical record on nurse documentation time.
    Hakes B; Whittington J
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2008; 26(4):234-41. PubMed ID: 18600132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancing patient safety through electronic medical record documentation of vital signs.
    Gearing P; Olney CM; Davis K; Lozano D; Smith LB; Friedman B
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2006; 20(4):40-5. PubMed ID: 17091789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.