These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20462319)

  • 1. Beauty and the beholder: highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images.
    Vessel EA; Rubin N
    J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):18.1-14. PubMed ID: 20462319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stronger shared taste for natural aesthetic domains than for artifacts of human culture.
    Vessel EA; Maurer N; Denker AH; Starr GG
    Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():121-131. PubMed ID: 29936343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Art expertise in construing meaning of representational and abstract artworks.
    Bimler DL; Snellock M; Paramei GV
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():11-22. PubMed ID: 30390421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does beauty capture the eye, even if it's not (overtly) adaptive? A comparative eye-tracking study of spontaneous attention and visual preference with VAST abstract art.
    Mitrovic A; Hegelmaier LM; Leder H; Pelowski M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103133. PubMed ID: 32717655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Influence of Art Expertise and Training on Emotion and Preference Ratings for Representational and Abstract Artworks.
    van Paasschen J; Bacci F; Melcher DP
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134241. PubMed ID: 26244368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The world can look better: enhancing beauty experience with brain stimulation.
    Cattaneo Z; Lega C; Flexas A; Nadal M; Munar E; Cela-Conde CJ
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Nov; 9(11):1713-21. PubMed ID: 24132459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of beauty and liking ratings for abstract and representational paintings using subjective and objective measures.
    Sidhu DM; McDougall KH; Jalava ST; Bodner GE
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200431. PubMed ID: 29979779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Infant's visual preferences for facial traits associated with adult attractiveness judgements: data from eye-tracking.
    Griffey JA; Little AC
    Infant Behav Dev; 2014 Aug; 37(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 24793735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting beauty: fractal dimension and visual complexity in art.
    Forsythe A; Nadal M; Sheehy N; Cela-Conde CJ; Sawey M
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Feb; 102(1):49-70. PubMed ID: 21241285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subliminal presentation of emotionally negative vs positive primes increases the perceived beauty of target stimuli.
    Era V; Candidi M; Aglioti SM
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 233(11):3271-81. PubMed ID: 26238406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual Aesthetic Preferences for Faces Are Shaped Mostly by Environments, Not Genes.
    Germine L; Russell R; Bronstad PM; Blokland GA; Smoller JW; Kwok H; Anthony SE; Nakayama K; Rhodes G; Wilmer JB
    Curr Biol; 2015 Oct; 25(20):2684-9. PubMed ID: 26441352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The roles of scene gist and spatial dependency among objects in the semantic guidance of attention in real-world scenes.
    Wu CC; Wang HC; Pomplun M
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():10-20. PubMed ID: 25199610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shared liking and association valence for representational art but not abstract art.
    Schepman A; Rodway P; Pullen SJ; Kirkham J
    J Vis; 2015; 15(5):11. PubMed ID: 26067529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Once more: is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness.
    Hönekopp J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16634665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is better beautiful or is beautiful better? Exploring the relationship between beauty and category structure.
    Sanders M; Davis T; Love BC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Jun; 20(3):566-73. PubMed ID: 23242799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aesthetic preference for art can be predicted from a mixture of low- and high-level visual features.
    Iigaya K; Yi S; Wahle IA; Tanwisuth K; O'Doherty JP
    Nat Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 5(6):743-755. PubMed ID: 34017097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-cultural comparison of beauty judgments in visual art using machine learning analysis of art attribute predictors among Japanese and German speakers.
    Mikuni J; Spee BTM; Forlani G; Leder H; Scharnowski F; Nakamura K; Watanabe K; Kawabata H; Pelowski M; Steyrl D
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):15948. PubMed ID: 38987540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beauty in the Eye of the Beholder.
    Friedenberg J
    Exp Psychol; 2019 Mar; 66(2):112-125. PubMed ID: 30895912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting Rossion and Pourtois with new ratings for automated complexity, familiarity, beauty, and encounter.
    Forsythe A; Street N; Helmy M
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1484-1493. PubMed ID: 27699592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolutionary Effect on the Embodied Beauty of Landscape Architectures.
    Zhang W; Tang X; He X; Chen G
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704917749742. PubMed ID: 29347841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.