BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20462521)

  • 1. Consent in clinical trials: what do patients know?
    Hereu P; Pérez E; Fuentes I; Vidal X; Suñé P; Arnau JM
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Sep; 31(5):443-6. PubMed ID: 20462521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Different opinions when it comes to research ethics issues concerning patients with dementia. A questionnaire study among members of research ethics committees].
    Peterson G; Wallin A
    Lakartidningen; 2004 May; 101(20):1810-2. PubMed ID: 15190768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?
    Emanuel EJ
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):9-13; discussion W8-11, W17. PubMed ID: 16179296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Process for obtaining informed consent: women's opinions.
    Bento SF; Hardy E; Osis MJ
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 19046257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects.
    Hossne WS; Vieira S; De Freitas CB
    J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):131-41, 200. PubMed ID: 18664006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dermatology: obtaining a patient consent in clinical trials.
    Dimond B
    Br J Nurs; 2006 May 11-24; 15(9):500-1. PubMed ID: 16723924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stakeholder perspectives on ethical challenges in HIV vaccine trials in South Africa.
    Essack Z; Koen J; Barsdorf N; Slack C; Quayle M; Milford C; Lindegger G; Ranchod C; Mukuka R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2010 Apr; 10(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 19459900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What do our patients understand about their trial participation? Assessing patients' understanding of their informed consent consultation about randomised clinical trials.
    Behrendt C; Gölz T; Roesler C; Bertz H; Wünsch A
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 21098797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Undue inducement: the only objection to payment?
    VanderWalde A
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):25-7. PubMed ID: 16179303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Respondent burden in clinical research: when are we asking too much of subjects?
    Ulrich CM; Wallen GR; Feister A; Grady C
    IRB; 2005; 27(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 16220630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The problem with optimism in clinical trials.
    Jansen LA
    IRB; 2006; 28(4):13-9. PubMed ID: 17036434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Legal and ethical issues associated with patient recruitment in clinical trials: the case of competitive enrolment.
    Caulfield T
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):58-61. PubMed ID: 16459415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding informed consent for participation in international health research.
    Jegede AS
    Dev World Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 18637943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethics in clinical research: need for assessing comprehension of informed consent form?
    Shafiq N; Malhotra S
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Mar; 32(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 21146634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of a clinical trials information handbook on patient knowledge, perceptions, and likelihood of participation.
    Campbell HM; Raisch DW; Sather MR; Segal AR; Warren SR; Naik R
    IRB; 2008; 30(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 18306954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
    Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research versus innovation: real differences.
    Morreim H
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):42-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving subject recruitment by maintaining truly informed consent: a practical benefit of disclosing adverse clinical trial results.
    Shah KR; Batzer FR
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):36-7. PubMed ID: 19998157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and research ethics as moral strangers.
    Kottow MH
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 19479200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.