173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20463377)
1. Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms.
Alonzo-Proulx O; Packard N; Boone JM; Al-Mayah A; Brock KK; Shen SZ; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(11):3027-44. PubMed ID: 20463377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry.
Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Qin X; Fei B; Feng SS
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5050-9. PubMed ID: 22894430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relationship between anatomic noise and volumetric breast density for digital mammography.
Mainprize JG; Tyson AH; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4660-8. PubMed ID: 22894390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.
Keller BM; Nathan DL; Wang Y; Zheng Y; Gee JC; Conant EF; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4903-17. PubMed ID: 22894417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Calibration of Full-Field Digital Mammography: Feasibility on Japanese Women With and Without Breast Cancer.
Wang J; Kato F; Yamashita H; Baba M; Cui Y; Li R; Oyama-Manabe N; Shirato H
J Digit Imaging; 2017 Apr; 30(2):215-227. PubMed ID: 27832519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.
Ducote JL; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5411-8. PubMed ID: 19175100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose.
Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Cutter GR
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 12674233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast density quantification in dual-energy mammography using virtual anthropomorphic phantoms.
Pacheco G; Castillo-Lopez JP; Villaseñor-Navarro Y; Brandan ME
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 May; 25(5):e14360. PubMed ID: 38648734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of volumetric breast density estimations from mammography and thorax CT.
Geeraert N; Klausz R; Cockmartin L; Muller S; Bosmans H; Bloch I
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4391-409. PubMed ID: 25049219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections.
Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3395-408. PubMed ID: 16372415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deep learning for x-ray scatter correction in dedicated breast CT.
Pautasso JJ; Caballo M; Mikerov M; Boone JM; Michielsen K; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2022-2036. PubMed ID: 36565012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Updated breast CT dose coefficients (DgN
Hernandez AM; Becker AE; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30661250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Power spectrum analysis of the x-ray scatter signal in mammography and breast tomosynthesis projections.
Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Fei B
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101905. PubMed ID: 24089907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.
Kaufhold J; Thomas JA; Eberhard JW; Galbo CE; Trotter DE
Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1867-80. PubMed ID: 12201434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of anode-filter combinations on image quality and radiation dose in 965 women undergoing mammography.
Thilander-Klang AC; Ackerholm PH; Berlin IC; Bjurstam NG; Mattsson SL; Månsson LG; von Schéele C; Thunberg SJ
Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 9114087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Volumetric breast density measurement: sensitivity analysis of a relative physics approach.
Lau S; Ng KH; Abdul Aziz YF
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160258. PubMed ID: 27452264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of X-ray scattering for various phantoms and clinical breast geometries using breast CT on a dedicated hybrid system.
Shah JP; Mann SD; Tornai MP
J Xray Sci Technol; 2017; 25(3):373-389. PubMed ID: 28157120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual-energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Lu KM; Yeh DM; Cao BH; Lin CY; Liang CY; Zhou YB; Tsai CJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):170-177. PubMed ID: 31106990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
