173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20463377)
21. Volumetric breast density characteristics as determined from digital mammograms.
Alonzo-Proulx O; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7443-57. PubMed ID: 23093428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis guided Near Infrared Spectroscopy: Volumetric estimates of fibroglandular fraction and breast density from tomosynthesis reconstructions.
Vedantham S; Shi L; Michaelsen KE; Krishnaswamy V; Pogue BW; Poplack SP; Karellas A; Paulsen KD
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2015; 1(4):. PubMed ID: 26941961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantification and normalization of x-ray mammograms.
Tromans CE; Cocker MR; Brady SM
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 57(20):6519-40. PubMed ID: 23010610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Breast composition and radiographic breast equivalence.
McLean D
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Mar; 20(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 9141308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. INDIVIDUALISED CALCULATION OF TISSUE IMPARTED ENERGY IN BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS.
Geeraert N; Klausz R; Muller S; Bloch I; Bosmans H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):267-73. PubMed ID: 27127209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Generation of a suite of 3D computer-generated breast phantoms from a limited set of human subject data.
Hsu CM; Palmeri ML; Segars WP; Veress AI; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):043703. PubMed ID: 23556929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms.
Pawluczyk O; Augustine BJ; Yaffe MJ; Rico D; Yang J; Mawdsley GE; Boyd NF
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 12674236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography.
Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Yaffe M; Alm Carlsson G
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3143-52. PubMed ID: 15972986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dataset of patient-derived digital breast phantoms for in silico studies in breast computed tomography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; di Franco F; Varallo A; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2682-2693. PubMed ID: 33683711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Field nonuniformity correction for quantitative analysis of digitized mammograms.
Pawluczyk O; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2001 Apr; 28(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 11339739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Computational simulation of breast compression based on segmented breast and fibroglandular tissues on magnetic resonance images.
Shih TC; Chen JH; Liu D; Nie K; Sun L; Lin M; Chang D; Nalcioglu O; Su MY
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(14):4153-68. PubMed ID: 20601773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: an experimental feasibility study.
Ducote JL; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):793-801. PubMed ID: 20229889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. X-ray scatter correction in breast tomosynthesis with a precomputed scatter map library.
Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS; Seidel RL; Patel B; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031912. PubMed ID: 24593730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: application for mammography.
Bliznakova K; Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5604-17. PubMed ID: 21158272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population.
Vedantham S; Shi L; Karellas A; O'Connell AM
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7317-28. PubMed ID: 23231281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast.
Chen L; Boone JM; Abbey CK; Hargreaves J; Bateni C; Lindfors KK; Yang K; Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Gazi P
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3347-58. PubMed ID: 25825980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Marshall N; Meylaers T; Michielsen K; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
